2020
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2020.01031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability impacts word and character processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average accuracy rate for all participants was 92.08%, indicating that the subjects read and understood the sentences carefully. Referring to the existing literature [ 21 , 34 , 43 , 53 ], the data were eliminated according to the following criteria: (1) any fixation duration shorter than 80 ms or longer than 1,200 ms, (2) the data less than 5 fixation points during reading, (3) the data with fixation exceeding 3 standard deviations (the average deletion rate was 3.40%), and (4) trials in which there was a blink when the eye first passed through the boundary or fixed at the target word and trials in which the display change were premature or delayed (20.79%). See Table 3 for the means and standard deviation of each indication of the target word.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average accuracy rate for all participants was 92.08%, indicating that the subjects read and understood the sentences carefully. Referring to the existing literature [ 21 , 34 , 43 , 53 ], the data were eliminated according to the following criteria: (1) any fixation duration shorter than 80 ms or longer than 1,200 ms, (2) the data less than 5 fixation points during reading, (3) the data with fixation exceeding 3 standard deviations (the average deletion rate was 3.40%), and (4) trials in which there was a blink when the eye first passed through the boundary or fixed at the target word and trials in which the display change were premature or delayed (20.79%). See Table 3 for the means and standard deviation of each indication of the target word.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with a low-constrained context, a high-constrained context had greater limits on target words, activated a smaller scope, and had more features of the target words. As such, the target words were more easily integrated and understood, which promoted the processing of these target words [ 53 ]. These results are consistent with previous research results indicating that contextual information could promote lexical processing in different languages [ 25 , 34 , 44 , 62 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also many studies on the interaction between context predictability and other factors, as follows: Liu et al (2020) explored how context predictability affects Chinese vocabulary processing in reading by observing the interaction between context predictability, whole word frequency, and Chinese character frequency. The results showed that context predictability, whole word frequency, and first character frequency affect vocabulary processing relatively independently; contextual predictability directly affects the processing of the second character within words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%