2012
DOI: 10.14191/atmos.2012.22.3.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability for Heavy Rainfall over the Korean Peninsula during the Summer using TIGGE Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamagughi and Majumdar (2010) investigated the dynamic mechanism of perturbation growth in a tropical cyclone (Sinlaku, the typhoon in 2008) using ECMWF, NCEP, and JMA ensembles and found that the vertical and horizontal distributions of the initial perturbations, as well as the amplitude, were quite different among three NWP centers before, during, and after the recurvature of Typhoon Sinlaku. Hwang et al (2012) compared the performances of six ensemble models and a grand ensemble (GE) of the three best ensemble models (ECMWF, UKMO, and CMA) for inconsistencies, jumpiness, and rootmean square difference (RMSD) for 500 hPa geopotential height, 850 hPa temperature, and mean sea-level pressure and verified that the GE was more consistent than each of the single ensemble models. Additionally, in a case study of a heavy rainfall event using the GE, it was found that the GE was more skillful than the single ensemble model, which could lead to early warnings for heavy rainfall in the medium range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Yamagughi and Majumdar (2010) investigated the dynamic mechanism of perturbation growth in a tropical cyclone (Sinlaku, the typhoon in 2008) using ECMWF, NCEP, and JMA ensembles and found that the vertical and horizontal distributions of the initial perturbations, as well as the amplitude, were quite different among three NWP centers before, during, and after the recurvature of Typhoon Sinlaku. Hwang et al (2012) compared the performances of six ensemble models and a grand ensemble (GE) of the three best ensemble models (ECMWF, UKMO, and CMA) for inconsistencies, jumpiness, and rootmean square difference (RMSD) for 500 hPa geopotential height, 850 hPa temperature, and mean sea-level pressure and verified that the GE was more consistent than each of the single ensemble models. Additionally, in a case study of a heavy rainfall event using the GE, it was found that the GE was more skillful than the single ensemble model, which could lead to early warnings for heavy rainfall in the medium range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…5개의 지역기후모델 중 HadGEM3-RA는 ERA-interim과 다른 지역기후모델에 비해 육지 에서 풍속을 과소 모의하는 반면 (Fig. 2b) (Zoster et al, 2009;Hwang et al, 2012) 0에 가까울수록 일관성이 높은 것을 의미한다. 계산식은 Hwang et al (2012) (Fig.…”
Section: )unclassified