2022
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2021.3103258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predefined-Time Predefined-Bounded Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid Spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V q ≤ −γq 0 q v α+1 , with α ∈ (0, 1) , γ > 0 (13) Comparing with (12) and ( 13) it could be got that if there exist positive scalar γ to satisfy following inequality, the finite-time stability could be ensured.…”
Section: Finite-time Controller Based On Attitude Quaternionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…V q ≤ −γq 0 q v α+1 , with α ∈ (0, 1) , γ > 0 (13) Comparing with (12) and ( 13) it could be got that if there exist positive scalar γ to satisfy following inequality, the finite-time stability could be ensured.…”
Section: Finite-time Controller Based On Attitude Quaternionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get finite-time stability near the system equilibrium point, researchers have done a lot of work. Ye and Xiao and so on [11,12] designed finite-time controllers for satellite control. The focus of their work is the control torque allocation algorithm and the fault tolerant algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al (2021) proposed an adaptive fixed-time SMC strategy to maintain accurate attitude tracking performance in the presence of system uncertainties. Ye et al (2022b) presented a nonsingular predefined-time predefined-bounded attitude tracking controller for spacecraft subject to bounded external disturbances based on a novel nonsingular terminal sliding mode surface. However, chattering phenomenon owing to the large switching gain and requirement of prior knowledge of the controlled system are two main drawbacks of conventional SMC (Chu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the control algorithms commonly used in actual engineering have poor adaptability to the problems of spacecraft model uncertainty, imbalance, external disturbance, and actuator failure. In recent years, spacecraft attitude control algorithms such as adaptive control [2], neural networks [3], robust control [4,5], optimal control, sliding mode control [6], fuzzy logic [7] and intelligent control [8][9][10] have gradually attracted attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%