“…Because of this, size structure is fundamental to quantifying and managing (e.g., through harvest regulations, predator suppression, or adjusting stocking practices) the often complex interactions among kokanee, their predators (native or introduced), and anglers. For example, quantifying kokanee population dynamics and productivity (Hansen et al 2010;Pate et al 2014;Corsi et al, in press), the susceptibility of kokanee to different introduced predators (Schoen et al 2012;Hansen et al 2019), emerging parasite-host dynamics involving Salmincola (Hargis et al 2014), recreational harvest dynamics (Askey and Johnston 2013), and predicting spawner escapement for informing wild-spawn and hatchery operations (Baldwin and McLellan 2008) require minimally biased information on size and age structure. Although retention models alone likely do not account for all processes influencing the size selectivity of experimental gill nets, they remove some bias and strengthen evaluations like those listed above.…”