1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02350211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predatory behavior of the praying mantis,Tenodera aridifolia II. Combined effect of prey size and predator size on the prey recognition

Abstract: --Predatory behavior of the praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia, as a function of the combined effect of its size and the size of the prey was investigated by using prey models. Behavioral responses were almost identical through the nymphal development in the predator. As the mantis grew, it attacked larger prey models, suggesting that it recognizes the prey's size in accordance with its own body size. Regression analyses demonstrate that the ratio of the prey's volume to the cube and the square of the predato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some examples of the many affordances that humans can perceptually determine include the largest crossable gap in a locomotor path (Mark et al, 1999), what is reachable and what is not (Carello et al, 1989), the smallest openings through which walking is possible (Warren and Whang, 1987), and even visually perceiving stair heights that are that are energetically optimal (Warren, 1984). The limited data available on the affordances of non-human species suggest that several other phylogenetically diverse species, such as toads (Lock and Collett, 1979) and praying mantis (Iwasaki, 1991), are equally sensitive to critical animal-environment relations that limit possible actions. Thus, many of the affordances perceived by animals are more complex than simply the size of the animal relative to some dimension in the environment.…”
Section: Integrating Sensory Information With Motor Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of the many affordances that humans can perceptually determine include the largest crossable gap in a locomotor path (Mark et al, 1999), what is reachable and what is not (Carello et al, 1989), the smallest openings through which walking is possible (Warren and Whang, 1987), and even visually perceiving stair heights that are that are energetically optimal (Warren, 1984). The limited data available on the affordances of non-human species suggest that several other phylogenetically diverse species, such as toads (Lock and Collett, 1979) and praying mantis (Iwasaki, 1991), are equally sensitive to critical animal-environment relations that limit possible actions. Thus, many of the affordances perceived by animals are more complex than simply the size of the animal relative to some dimension in the environment.…”
Section: Integrating Sensory Information With Motor Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, length variation has been documented among mantid nymphs of the same instar (Hurd & eisenberg 1989), as well as among adult females within and between years (Matsura et al 1975;eisenberg et al 1981;Maxwell & eitan 1998;Maxwell & Frinchaboy, in press). In Tenodera aridifolia Saussure, larger nymphal instars are more likely to attack larger prey, in addition to being more likely to attack smaller conspecific instars (Hurd 1988;Iwasaki 1991;Whitman & Vincent 2008). For T. angustipennis Saussure, Matsura et al (1975) suggest a positive relationship between body length and ootheca (egg case) mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference in these visual factors is affected by the body size of mantises (e.g. Iwasaki, ). Distance is also critical, as is evident in the mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burmeister), which strikes close targets more frequently than far targets (Prete & Mahaffey, ; Nityananda et al ., ).…”
Section: Predatory Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%