2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26757-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predator experience changes spider mites’ habitat choice even without current threat

Abstract: As recent studies have revealed, previous exposure to a predator can change prey behavior even in the absence of current threat. We hypothesized that experiencing a predator increases prey avoidance of lower-quality resources even in the absence of a predator, which in turn influences the prey’s spatial distribution. We examined these hypotheses using the herbivorous spider mite Tetranychus kanzawai and the specialist predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi. We used Phaseolus vulgaris as a high-quality host plant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, they may rely on chemical cues (kairomones) secreted by adjacent plants, informing about the quality of nearby hosts or about the presence of competitors or predators. Such informed dispersal has been shown in many animal species (Sabelis & Afman, 1994;Jung & Croft, 2001;Bowler & Benton, 2005;Clobert et al, 2009), including spider mites and predatory phytoseiid mites (Janssen et al, 1997;Bitume et al, 2013;Murase & Fujita, 2018;Van Petegem et al, 2018); however, although this has been experimentally tested in eriophyid mites, it has not been confirmed (Melo et al, 2014). Active dispersal can also contribute to the range increase via slow diffusive spread once organisms have been introduced to a new area (Gozlan et al, 2010), albeit on a smaller spatial scale than passive dispersal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they may rely on chemical cues (kairomones) secreted by adjacent plants, informing about the quality of nearby hosts or about the presence of competitors or predators. Such informed dispersal has been shown in many animal species (Sabelis & Afman, 1994;Jung & Croft, 2001;Bowler & Benton, 2005;Clobert et al, 2009), including spider mites and predatory phytoseiid mites (Janssen et al, 1997;Bitume et al, 2013;Murase & Fujita, 2018;Van Petegem et al, 2018); however, although this has been experimentally tested in eriophyid mites, it has not been confirmed (Melo et al, 2014). Active dispersal can also contribute to the range increase via slow diffusive spread once organisms have been introduced to a new area (Gozlan et al, 2010), albeit on a smaller spatial scale than passive dispersal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, T. urticae in Japan is observed only in agroecosystems where predators are less abundant, whereas T. kanzawai lives on wild plants where predators are abundant. Because, it is known that T. kanzawai potentially encounters predators more frequently than T. urticae does (Murase et al, 2018).…”
Section: Family Tetranychidae Donnadieumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoseiulus fallacis (Garman) (Mesostigmata; Phytoseiidae) is effective on tea (Zhang 2003). It is also associated with Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans) (Zhang 2003) and Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha) (Mesostigmata; Phytoseiidae) (Murase and Fujita 2018). Besides predator mites, T. kanzawai can also be controlled by predatory insects.…”
Section: Family Tetranychidae Donnadieumentioning
confidence: 99%