2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2677-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation-risk effects of predator identity on the foraging behaviors of frugivorous bats

Abstract: Predators directly and indirectly affect the density and the behavior of prey. These effects may potentially cascade down to lower trophic levels. In this study, we tested the effects of predator calls (playbacks of bird vocalizations: Tyto alba, Speotyto cunicularia, and Vanellus chilensis), predator visual stimuli (stuffed birds) and interactions of visual and auditory cues, on the behavior of frugivore phyllostomid bats in the field. In addition, we tested if the effects of predation risk cascade down to ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To actively avoid predation, bats may voluntarily adjust certain routine behaviors, such as the choice of day roosts [ 14 ] and the timing of departure from a roost [ 15 ]. This type of decision making to avoid distress is facilitated by auditory [ 16 ], visual [ 17 ], and chemical cues [ 18 ]. We know even less about on the spot, “impulsive” decision making when bats need to escape from a life-threatening situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To actively avoid predation, bats may voluntarily adjust certain routine behaviors, such as the choice of day roosts [ 14 ] and the timing of departure from a roost [ 15 ]. This type of decision making to avoid distress is facilitated by auditory [ 16 ], visual [ 17 ], and chemical cues [ 18 ]. We know even less about on the spot, “impulsive” decision making when bats need to escape from a life-threatening situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widespread response to reduce predation risk is to shift habitat use away from areas with high predation risk (Creel, Winnie Jr, Maxwell, Hamlin, & Creel, 2005;Valeix et al, 2009). Across a range of taxa, such a habitat shift involves a trade-off between access to resources and safety (Breviglieri, Piccoli, Uieda, & Romero, 2013;Embar, Raveh, Burns, & Kotler, 2014;Heithaus, Wirsing, Burkholder, Thomson, & Dill, 2009;Nonacs & Dill,1990). A typical situation for large grazing mammals is that individuals have to choose between open habitats with good foraging opportunities, but where they are visible to predators, and habitats that provide more cover from potential dangers but which might limit foraging efficiency (Godvik et al, 2009;Werner, Gilliam, Hall, & Mittelbach, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Breviglieri et al . ). These signs trigger different anti‐predatory strategies (Bernot & Turner ) that can vary depending on the identity of prey (Lima ; Zuberbühler et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Breviglieri et al . , ). Several mechanisms allow prey to recognise their predators, such as innate behaviour, learned behaviour patterns developed through observing the behaviour of congeners (Griffin ) or heterospecifics (Fallow et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%