2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation risk and reproductive effort: impacts of moonlight on food provisioning and chick growth in Manx shearwaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although we have identified the ratio of colony light exposure to surrounding areas as an important factor, making colonies brighter is not a solution because of the other adverse affects this would entail (e.g., increased predation; Oro et al 2005;Riou and Hamer 2008;Keitt et al 2004). Mitigation measures should include the use of light shielding, particularly in sites that attract more birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, although we have identified the ratio of colony light exposure to surrounding areas as an important factor, making colonies brighter is not a solution because of the other adverse affects this would entail (e.g., increased predation; Oro et al 2005;Riou and Hamer 2008;Keitt et al 2004). Mitigation measures should include the use of light shielding, particularly in sites that attract more birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have suggested that nocturnal colony attendance among these seabirds is an adaptation to minimize predation risk from diurnal avian predators [36], [37], [38]. Nocturnal seabirds reduce nighttime activity and alter the timing of their visit to the colony on moonlit nights, supporting the idea that nocturnal visitation reduces predation risk [3], [39]. Despite nocturnal colony attendance, ancient murrelets are frequently killed by predators on their breeding grounds, presumably while returning to or departing from their nests [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…60 d of age in 2007 and 2008. Trials at the colony indicated that weak and intermittent signals were sometimes received if a bird was on the water in the vicinity of land, but consistent, strong signals were obtained only from birds returning to their nests (Riou & Hamer 2008). Chicks were weighed twice daily (at dawn and dusk), and mass increments between successive weighings overnight were used as estimates of meal sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%