1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00378454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation by three owl species on northern pocket gophers of different body mass

Abstract: We examined the estimated sizes of Thomomys talpoides in the diets of Bubo virginianus (1,505 g), Tyto alba (437 g), and Asio otus (245 g) in north-central Oregon between 1973 and 1982. The three owl species tended to consume T. talpoides of different size and responded differently to predicted seasonal body mass changes in the T. talpoides population. On an annual basis B. virginianus preyed upon the largest individuals (x = 67.9 g), whereas A. otus preyed upon the smallest (x = 41.0 g). When compared with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of predation by raptors indicate that prey body size (Barrett and Mackey, 1975;Snyder et al, 1976;Marti and Hogue, 1979;Postler and Barrett, 1982;James and Barss, 1985), conspicuousness (Kaufman and Wagner, 1973;Kaufman, 1974a), and/or levels and patterns of locomotor activity (Glickman and Morrison, 1969;Snyder et al, 1976;Kotler, 1985) influence prey vulnerability to raptor predation. The combined effects of these and other physical and behavioral parameters may explain differential vulnerability of male and female (Rusch et al, 1972) and of young and old (Goszczynski, 1977;Beacham, 1979;Brown, 1981) prey to raptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies of predation by raptors indicate that prey body size (Barrett and Mackey, 1975;Snyder et al, 1976;Marti and Hogue, 1979;Postler and Barrett, 1982;James and Barss, 1985), conspicuousness (Kaufman and Wagner, 1973;Kaufman, 1974a), and/or levels and patterns of locomotor activity (Glickman and Morrison, 1969;Snyder et al, 1976;Kotler, 1985) influence prey vulnerability to raptor predation. The combined effects of these and other physical and behavioral parameters may explain differential vulnerability of male and female (Rusch et al, 1972) and of young and old (Goszczynski, 1977;Beacham, 1979;Brown, 1981) prey to raptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Scott and Murdoch 1983); this limit should increase with predator size. Alternatively, small predators may be physically unable to capture relatively large prey that move quickly (Pernetta 1976, Janes andBarss 1985), evade capture (Nentwig 1983, Richards andBull 1990), or have an exoskeleton that is too thick to puncture (Terry 1978). Large predators appear to be less constrained, morphologically, in taking very small prey; however, small prey may sometimes be too small to detect (Crowcroft 1957).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to capture and mark rabbits with radio transmitters and record when are they killed, but the costs of materials and labour used in rabbit radio tracking studies renders collaring and monitoring of large numbers of rabbits prohibitively expensive. Another approach is to analyze prey remains left by predators at carcasses, skeletons, or big osseous structures of ingested prey that can be found in pile remains and in bigger raptor pellets (Janes and Barss 1985, Donázar and Ceballos 1989, Dickman et al 1991, Rohner et al 1995, Barry and Barry 1996. In carnivore feces, long osseous structures are more fragmented because carnivores crush the bones before swallowing, and only the smallest hard remains of prey can be recovered intact (Calzada and Palomares 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%