2010
DOI: 10.1899/09-071.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predation and physical environment structure the density and population size structure of zebra mussels

Abstract: Abstract. The zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) provides one example of successful invaders in novel environments. However, little attention has been devoted to exploring the factors regulating zebra mussel density and population size structure at the local scale. We tested effects of physicochemical factors and fish predation on the density of zebra mussels at several sites and between years in a natural lake. Water depth and roach (Rutilus rutilus) density were the most important variables affecting local … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(68 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that surface area was more important than lake volume for zebra mussels' density due to its effect on Dreissena infestation rate (Kraft & Johnson, 2000) and population dynamics (Ramcharan et al, 1992b). We retained mean depth instead of Secchi depth because water depth is one of the most important variables affecting local zebra mussel density (Naddafi et al, 2010). Mean depth was highly collinear with maximum depth, so we excluded maximum depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that surface area was more important than lake volume for zebra mussels' density due to its effect on Dreissena infestation rate (Kraft & Johnson, 2000) and population dynamics (Ramcharan et al, 1992b). We retained mean depth instead of Secchi depth because water depth is one of the most important variables affecting local zebra mussel density (Naddafi et al, 2010). Mean depth was highly collinear with maximum depth, so we excluded maximum depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, zebra mussels are considerably affected by a number of predators (Molloy et al 1997), roach being one of the most important species, capable of strongly influencing mussel population structure and density (Naddafi et al 2010). However, predator pressure upon zebra mussel populations varies widely among particular water bodies, as indicated by differences in their age at mortality observed by Czarnołęski et al (2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most efficient molluscivores feeding on this species is roach Rutilus rutilus (Prejs et al 1990;Molloy et al 1997), able to considerably affect mussel density in the field (Naddafi et al 2010). In the presence of roach, zebra mussels are more strongly attached to the substratum, more often form aggregations (Kobak and Kakareko 2009;Kobak et al 2010) and reduce their filtration rate (Naddafi et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on Dreissena ecology has identified many potential controls on their populations, including predation (Carlsson, Bustamante, Strayer, & Pace, 2011;Naddafi, Pettersson, & Eklov, 2010;Petrie & Knapton, 1999), regular or catastrophic physical or chemical disturbance (e.g. The literature on Dreissena ecology has identified many potential controls on their populations, including predation (Carlsson, Bustamante, Strayer, & Pace, 2011;Naddafi, Pettersson, & Eklov, 2010;Petrie & Knapton, 1999), regular or catastrophic physical or chemical disturbance (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%