1980
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600690735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precorneal retention of topically instilled micronized particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retention of any of the four microparticle types, when administered as a suspension, was relatively poor, with just 1 – 10 % remaining after 10 min and even less at later times. We believe that this poor retention can be partially explained by the co-administration of eye drop carrier fluid to the preocular space, which is known to expedite tear drainage and thus remove microparticles more rapidly 29, 30…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention of any of the four microparticle types, when administered as a suspension, was relatively poor, with just 1 – 10 % remaining after 10 min and even less at later times. We believe that this poor retention can be partially explained by the co-administration of eye drop carrier fluid to the preocular space, which is known to expedite tear drainage and thus remove microparticles more rapidly 29, 30…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schoenwald and Stewart, a smaller mean particle size in 0.1% dexamethasone suspensions resulted in greater drug levels in the cornea and aqueous humor 24 . However, particles that are too small may undergo faster elimination from the conjunctival sac; therefore, there is a lower limit for particle-size retention and an upper limit for ocular surface irritation 25 . Consequently, the active substance water solution may also be characterized by shorter retention in the conjunctival sac and fewer negative effects on the ocular surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to studies conducted to determine the effect of particle size on bioavailability, a particle size in this particular range is near ideal so that this particular parameter was not suspected.2'. 22 The ointment contained mineral oil, petrolatum, chlorobutanol, and fluorometholone acetate and therefore could be classified as a suspension. Bulk diffusion would be expected to be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%