2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218256109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preconfiguration of the antigen-binding site during affinity maturation of a broadly neutralizing influenza virus antibody

Abstract: Affinity maturation refines a naive B-cell response by selecting mutations in antibody variable domains that enhance antigen binding. We describe a B-cell lineage expressing broadly neutralizing influenza virus antibodies derived from a subject immunized with the 2007 trivalent vaccine. The lineage comprises three mature antibodies, the unmutated common ancestor, and a common intermediate. Their heavy-chain complementarity determining region inserts into the conserved receptor-binding pocket of influenza HA. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
264
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
264
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar analysis of other antigen selected and unselected human V regions should reveal why different V regions often dominate the response to different antigens and why we need so many V regions. Our findings also suggest that part of the process of developing new vaccine strategies should include the identification of motifs in those V regions that are likely to be initially be targeted AID and to use that information in planning which antigens should be used in sequential vaccines (1,30,(72)(73)(74). Similar genomewide analysis could also increase our understanding of the how AID is targeted to V and SRs and to certain off-target sites and contributes to our understanding of the biochemical mechanisms of these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A similar analysis of other antigen selected and unselected human V regions should reveal why different V regions often dominate the response to different antigens and why we need so many V regions. Our findings also suggest that part of the process of developing new vaccine strategies should include the identification of motifs in those V regions that are likely to be initially be targeted AID and to use that information in planning which antigens should be used in sequential vaccines (1,30,(72)(73)(74). Similar genomewide analysis could also increase our understanding of the how AID is targeted to V and SRs and to certain off-target sites and contributes to our understanding of the biochemical mechanisms of these processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, access to a conserved epitope using different modes of binding and varied angles of approach is an emerging theme for glycan-dependent antibody recognition of HIV-1 Env (33) and has defined a supersite of vulnerability on HIV-1. This concept is emulated here for influenza virus, where stem antibodies approach the epitope in different ways and use distinct interactions but have functionally similar modes of neutralization, as also observed for bnAbs to the HA receptor binding site (9)(10)(11)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Identification of antigenic sites on HA indicates that influenza antibodies are primarily directed against the immunodominant HA head region (7), which mediates endosomal uptake of the virus into host cells by binding to sialic acid receptors (8). Because of high mutation rates in the HA head region and its tolerance for antigenic changes, antibodies that target the HA head are typically only effective against strains closely related to the strain(s) by which they were elicited, although several receptor binding site-targeting antibodies with greater breadth have been structurally characterized (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). In contrast, antibodies that bind to the membrane-proximal HA stem region tend to exhibit much broader neutralizing activity and can target strains within entire subtypes and groups (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) as well as across influenza types (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If another unrelated antigen initiates the antibody response and somatic mutations change the antigen-binding site so it binds to an epitope on GM-CSF, it is unlikely that chance somatic mutations would change the antigen-binding sites to bind four nonoverlapping, conformational epitopes on GM-CSF. Two crystallographic studies of affinity maturation of human antibodies (29,30) establish that the increase in affinity is due to stabilization of the original antigen contacts and that the antigen-binding site of the original antibody has the same general conformation as the affinity-matured, high-affinity antibodies. If subsequent affinity maturation is driven by GM-CSF, the epitope on the mutated antibody should still overlap the original epitope on GM-CSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%