2010
DOI: 10.1137/090777797
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preconditioning Stochastic Galerkin Saddle Point Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Mixed finite element discretizations of deterministic second-order elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) lead to saddle point systems for which the study of iterative solvers and preconditioners is mature. Galerkin approximation of solutions of stochastic second-order elliptic PDEs, which couple standard mixed finite element discretizations in physical space with global polynomial approximation on a probability space, also give rise to linear systems with familiar saddle point structure. For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that A is ill-conditioned with respect to the mesh size h, the standard deviation σ of the logtransformed diffusion coefficient a (M) , and the total degree d of the chaos polynomials; see [17,37,47]. Ill-conditioning with respect to the spatial mesh size can be handled by a mean-based block-diagonal preconditioner derived by approximating the random diffusion coefficient exp(a (M) ) by its mean value exp(a (M) ) , see [23,31,35,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that A is ill-conditioned with respect to the mesh size h, the standard deviation σ of the logtransformed diffusion coefficient a (M) , and the total degree d of the chaos polynomials; see [17,37,47]. Ill-conditioning with respect to the spatial mesh size can be handled by a mean-based block-diagonal preconditioner derived by approximating the random diffusion coefficient exp(a (M) ) by its mean value exp(a (M) ) , see [23,31,35,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If (1.9) holds then the stability of this scheme can be established straight-forwardly (see [6] and [1]). As explained in [14], however, applying SGMFEMs to (1.6)-(1.8) leads to linear systems with block dense and ill-conditioned indefinite matrices that are highly expensive to solve. Our goal is to approximate q efficiently when the diffusion coefficient is the stochastically nonlinear function e a M .…”
Section: Darcy Flux Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further assume that the random variables ξ k : Ω → Γ k ⊂ R are bounded and independent. For simplicity, f is assumed to be a deterministic function of x ∈ D. It is well known (e.g., see [14]) that applying stochastic Galerkin finite element methods (SGFEMs) to PDEs with coefficients of the form e a M results in very large linear systems Ax = b with coefficient matrices of the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 1 (Lemma 5.3 in [1]). Let X be symmetric and positive definite, and let 0 < ν 1 ≤ · · · ≤ ν n , where n = n ξ n q , be the eigenvalues of X −1 A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proof given in [1], the two sentences under (5.19) on page 2813 are incorrect. For clarity, we give the entire proof again with the necessary correction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%