2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preconditioning bandgap eigenvalue problems in three-dimensional photonic crystals simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We summarize the JD and SIRA methods for solving the SEP (3.11) in Algorithm 4. Note that, in practice, a restart with search subspace contraction [16] is used in Algorithm 4. Compute W j = KV j and M j = V * j W j .…”
Section: Shift-invert Residual Arnoldi Methods For Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We summarize the JD and SIRA methods for solving the SEP (3.11) in Algorithm 4. Note that, in practice, a restart with search subspace contraction [16] is used in Algorithm 4. Compute W j = KV j and M j = V * j W j .…”
Section: Shift-invert Residual Arnoldi Methods For Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting matrix A arising from the discretized double-curl operator using the Yee scheme [51] on a primitive cell is then of the form [16,17,18]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the GEVP contains n zero eigenvalues and 2n positive eigenvalues. This large null space usually causes numerical inefficiency [17].…”
Section: Inverse Projective Lanczos Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we are interested in finding a few of the smallest positive eigenvalues, the large dimension of the null space leads to several numerical difficulties [8,16]. Second, the eigenvectors of A associated with the SC lattice are mutually independent of the 3D grid point indices i, j, and k. Consequently, the standard FFT can be applied to compute the associated photonic band gap in the SC lattice [11,17]. However, the FCC case has no such luxury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency domain solvers assume a time-harmonic variation of the fields and result in the need to solve a large generalised eigenvalue problem [1,2]. The application to complex three dimensional cavities can result in prohibitively expensive computations due to the large memory requirements or due to the lack of a preconditioners suitable for the large sparse linear systems that are encountered [3,4,5]. In addition, the performance of the solver is strongly problem dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%