2003
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2003.815299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precomputation schemes for QoS routing

Abstract: Abstract-Precomputation-based methods have recently been proposed as an instrument to facilitate scalability, improve response time, and reduce computation load on network elements. The key idea is to effectively reduce the time needed to handle an event by performing a certain amount of computations in advance, i.e., prior to the event's arrival. Such computations are performed as background processes, thus enabling to promptly provide a solution upon a request, through a simple, fast procedure.In this paper,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The WRR mechanism cycles through the queues. For each queue, packets are sent until the number of bytes transmitted exceeds the bandwidth determined by the queue's weighting coefficient, or the queue is empty [2,3]. Then the WRR mechanism moves to the next queue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WRR mechanism cycles through the queues. For each queue, packets are sent until the number of bytes transmitted exceeds the bandwidth determined by the queue's weighting coefficient, or the queue is empty [2,3]. Then the WRR mechanism moves to the next queue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of traffic by service class provides more equitable management and more stability for network applications than the use of priorities or preferences. WRR queuing is based on the belief that resource reduction is a better mechanism to control congestion than resource denial [1,2]. Other information about WRR models and detailed description of the status quo can be found in source [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that although H MCOP [6] has lower worst-case computational complexity than that of DIAHKP, its performance is not satisfactory. Moreover, it is generally believed that the standard Bellman-Ford algorithm has better performance than Disjktra algorithm in sparse networks, into which most communication networks can be classified [5].…”
Section: B Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational complexity is O(x 2 nm) for the Extended Bellman-Ford algorithm for two constraints, where n and m are the number of links and nodes, respectively. For the purpose of improving the response time and reducing the computation load on the network, precomputation-based methods [5] have been proposed. Korkmaz and Krunz [6] provided a heuristic with the computational complexity compatible to that of the Dijkstra algorithm to find the least cost Authors are with the Advanced Networking Laboratory, ECE Dept., NJIT, Newark, NJ 07012, U.S.A. (corresponding author to provide phone/fax: 973-596-3670; e-mail: ansari@njit.edu).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, sending data on diverse paths is a major tool of traffic engineering. Second, routers may use a precomputation approach in order to improve response time [12]. The key idea is to compute several QoS paths in advance and store them in a database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%