2017
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2017.2726007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precoder Design for Signal Superposition in MIMO-NOMA Multicell Networks

Abstract: Abstract-The throughput of users with poor channel conditions, such as those at a cell edge, is a bottleneck in wireless systems. A major part of the power budget must be allocated to serve these users in guaranteeing their quality-of-service (QoS) requirement, hampering QoS for other users and thus compromising the system reliability. In nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA), the message intended for a user with a poor channel condition is decoded by itself and by another user with a better channel condition. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these works, a joint power and user clustering (i.e., users with distinct channel conditions are grouped to perform NOMA jointly) has not been reported yet. Although the works in [31] and [32] proposed a two-zone pairing that randomly pairs two UEs from different zones, the use of random user pairing scheme may cause significant performance loss, compared to the optimal one. The authors in [9] studied a multi-zone based clustering, where the BS randomly selects one UE from each zone to form a cluster, leading to a suboptimal solution.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these works, a joint power and user clustering (i.e., users with distinct channel conditions are grouped to perform NOMA jointly) has not been reported yet. Although the works in [31] and [32] proposed a two-zone pairing that randomly pairs two UEs from different zones, the use of random user pairing scheme may cause significant performance loss, compared to the optimal one. The authors in [9] studied a multi-zone based clustering, where the BS randomly selects one UE from each zone to form a cluster, leading to a suboptimal solution.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2: As pointed out in [32], a larger cluster size with more distinct channel conditions among DL users is more desirable. This is because a large size of a DL cluster with very different channel gains plays a vital role in NOMA systems.…”
Section: Optimization Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, NOMA can be jointly designed with cooperative multiple point (CoMP) [9,109,110] or multipleantenna technology [41,[111][112][113]. Also, there have been some initial studies about employing NOMA in wireless power transfer network to increase the access opportunities [114][115][116].…”
Section: Joint Design With Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted in [9] that all existing works on multi-antenna NOMA systems can be classified into two categories: 1) there is a cluster of multiple users supported by each channel spatial dimension (or by a beamforming (BF) vector) in average that perform NOMA independently with the other clusters [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and 2) there is only one user supported by each channel spatial dimension in average 1 [16,17]. For the first category, [2] proposed a BF-based NOMA scheme, where a user clustering and power allocation algorithm was proposed to reduce the inter-cluster and intra-cluster interference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%