2018
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1540799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precoagulation with microwave ablation for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of precoagulation with microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection. Methods: A total of 66 eligible patients were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive either the traditional clamp-crushing method (Control group) or the MWA precoagulation method (MWA group) for hepatic parenchymal transection during liver partial resection. The operative time, hepatic portal occlusion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, MWA is widely accepted as an effective nonsurgical treatment option for liver cancer of a small size and at an early stage[ 19 - 23 ]. Of note, MWA has been demonstrated to completely destroy tumor cells and has been proposed as a radical treatment for small primary liver cancer (≤ 3 cm in diameter) with a single lesion[ 6 , 22 , 24 ]. In addition, Zhang et al [ 25 ] performed a meta-analysis of 1480 patients and showed that the therapeutic effectiveness of MWA was superior to that of surgical resection for the treatment of small liver cancer (< 3 cm in diameter).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, MWA is widely accepted as an effective nonsurgical treatment option for liver cancer of a small size and at an early stage[ 19 - 23 ]. Of note, MWA has been demonstrated to completely destroy tumor cells and has been proposed as a radical treatment for small primary liver cancer (≤ 3 cm in diameter) with a single lesion[ 6 , 22 , 24 ]. In addition, Zhang et al [ 25 ] performed a meta-analysis of 1480 patients and showed that the therapeutic effectiveness of MWA was superior to that of surgical resection for the treatment of small liver cancer (< 3 cm in diameter).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative bleeding increases the likelihood that transfusion will be required, which in turn increases the increased risk of complications and tumor recurrence [7,8]. Numerous devices are used to reduce bleeding during liver resection, such as ultrasonic surgical aspirators, ultrasonic dissection devices, bipolar electrosurgical devices, microwave assisted surgical devices [9][10][11] and radiofrequency (RF) based devices. Nonetheless, the clinical benefits of these devices have yet to be proven [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%