2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42235-019-0121-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical Strength Checking for Artificial Pelvic Prosthesis under Multi-activities - A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress values obtained in the "bone-endoprosthesis" system during the walking simulation are slightly higher than the stress values reported previously [28], where a similar approach was used. The reported peak stresses in the implant were approximately 105 MPa during the walking phase, and the stresses in the screws and pelvic bones were approximately 50 MPa under the same loading condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The stress values obtained in the "bone-endoprosthesis" system during the walking simulation are slightly higher than the stress values reported previously [28], where a similar approach was used. The reported peak stresses in the implant were approximately 105 MPa during the walking phase, and the stresses in the screws and pelvic bones were approximately 50 MPa under the same loading condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The reported peak stresses in the implant were approximately 105 MPa during the walking phase, and the stresses in the screws and pelvic bones were approximately 50 MPa under the same loading condition. Therefore, the authors [28] expected that the fatigue limit could be reached only in the case of more severe loading scenarios, such as stair climbing. The difference in the results can be explained by the difference in the implant design and the differences in the approaches of finite element modelling of the behaviour of the bone tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been widely used to solve clinical problems and has gained full acceptance. It has been applied to the study of the mechanism of damage to the human pelvis during underbody blast attacks on military vehicles [ 16 ], the effect of the structure of the area between the anus and vagina on giving birth [ 17 ], the effects of different surgical fixation strategies [ 18 ], sitting positions on patient rehabilitation during pelvic fractures [ 19 ], and the simulated stresses after implantation of different artificial prostheses in the pelvis [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. However, the biomechanical pelvic modeling methods used in these studies cannot be used in practice because they often ignore certain muscles or ligaments, which play a significant role in the production of reduction force [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive-manufactured (AM) orthopaedic implants with porous structures have received extensive attention in recent years because they not only weaken the stress shielding by reducing the equivalent elastic modulus of the implants [1,2] but promote long-term osseointegration through bone ingrowth in the porous structure [3,4]; thus, it appears as a promising solution to solve the long-term aseptic loosening of the metal orthopaedic implant. Metal AM technologies, mainly achieved by powder bed fusion (PBF), have become the main technique for manufacturing porous implants [5][6][7] and have been used in clinical research, such as in dental implants [8], artificial vertebral bodies [9], pelvic reconstruction [10], and acetabular cups [11], some of which have been commercialized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%