Pharm Adv 2021
DOI: 10.36118/pharmadvances.2021.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical models in oncological pharmacology: limits and advantages

Abstract: Introduction 2) In vitro models: 2.1 2D culture models 2.1.1 Cell lines 2.1.2 Primary cell culture 2.1.3 Others 2.2 3D cell culture models 3) In vivo models: 3.1 Immunocompetent mouse and rat models: syngeneic, genetically engineered mouse and carcinogen-induced models) 3.1.1 Ectopic and orthotopic syngeneic models 3.1.2 Genetically engineered mouse models 3.1.3 Carcinogen-induced models 3.2 Immunocompromised mouse models: cell-line derived and patient derived xenograft 3.3 zebrafish models 4) Integrated mathe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature for conducting experiments using zebrafish is lower than the human body temperature, which may affect the observed processes. Also, drug administration through direct absorption from the zebrafish medium may impact the precision in compound dosing [ 24 ]. The model also poses technical difficulties: due to its small size, manipulation of the equipment and implantation of cells is highly challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature for conducting experiments using zebrafish is lower than the human body temperature, which may affect the observed processes. Also, drug administration through direct absorption from the zebrafish medium may impact the precision in compound dosing [ 24 ]. The model also poses technical difficulties: due to its small size, manipulation of the equipment and implantation of cells is highly challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiwell microtiter plates are the backbone of in vitro life sciences and drug discovery research. Enormous infrastructure exists to facilitate their use and includes liquid handling and signal detection instruments compatible with a wide range of cell types (primary cells, cell lines, and organoids), formats (monolayer, sandwich culture, spheroids, and 3D scaffold), and readouts (fluorescence, high content imaging, soluble and cell extracted biomarkers, and omics) [ 28 ]. However, these in vitro systems have limitations when replicating human biology, a fundamental one being that they allow only fixed concentration bolus drug exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformed cell lines are robust and therefore more successful in transfection studies, allowing the stable introduction of genes in instances requiring the expression of a specific reporter, inducible expression of an extrinsic protein or as an overexpression system. Conversely specific methods of gene suppression (antisense RNA, small interfering RNA) allow the inhibition of gene activity more easily [35].…”
Section: Contextualising In Vitro and Preclinical Modelling Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%