2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49701-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical In Vivo Evaluation of Novel Radiosensitizers by Local Tumor Control Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,15,16 The preclinical evaluation of drug and radiation effects is challenging because of the need to measure the probability of local tumor control (tumor control probability [TCP]), integrate standard-of-care chemotherapy, and model the impact of the microenvironment. 62 Mouse models for the study of radiosensitizing agents have been reviewed recently, 63,64 and some controversy exists regarding the best in vivo models for this purpose. Every model has strengths and shortcomings, but heterotopic xenografts in nude mice have distinct advantages in that they readily allow testing of tumors from different genomic backgrounds, such as those derived from screened cell lines, and assessments of local control after fractionated radiation therapy.…”
Section: Initial Screening Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…9,15,16 The preclinical evaluation of drug and radiation effects is challenging because of the need to measure the probability of local tumor control (tumor control probability [TCP]), integrate standard-of-care chemotherapy, and model the impact of the microenvironment. 62 Mouse models for the study of radiosensitizing agents have been reviewed recently, 63,64 and some controversy exists regarding the best in vivo models for this purpose. Every model has strengths and shortcomings, but heterotopic xenografts in nude mice have distinct advantages in that they readily allow testing of tumors from different genomic backgrounds, such as those derived from screened cell lines, and assessments of local control after fractionated radiation therapy.…”
Section: Initial Screening Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific endpoint of tumor growth delay (TGD) compares the different times needed for treated (eg, drug plus radiation) versus control (radiation) tumors to reach a specified volume. 64 TGD is suitable for studies such as initial drug screening, proof-of-concept experiments, and investigations of mechanism of action or pharmacodynamics. 64 However, standard TGD experiments are able to assess only the treatment effects on bulk tumor cell kill, but not the inactivation of CSCs or clonogenic tumor cells.…”
Section: Initial Screening Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations