2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preclinical evaluation of aerosol administration systems using Positron Emission Tomography

Abstract: Pulmonary administration of drugs has recently gained attention because it exhibits numerous advantages compared to oral or intravenous administration. The administration of aerosols for inhalation to animals, however, remains a critical challenge and only a few methods of administration have been developed. Herein, we compare the regional distribution of aerosols in the lungs of wild type rats after pulmonary administration using three different methods: (a) The Penn-Century MicroSprayer® Aerosolizer; (b) an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ϳ2% of delivered dose) was low. These findings matched our in vivo imaging results, as well as the findings from an earlier study in which the deposition of 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-Dglucose (a clinically used radiotracer) after the same administration method was studied (33).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…ϳ2% of delivered dose) was low. These findings matched our in vivo imaging results, as well as the findings from an earlier study in which the deposition of 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-Dglucose (a clinically used radiotracer) after the same administration method was studied (33).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…20 µm droplet size. 37 The free drug ([ 18 F]FES) was also investigated as control and administered using the same system, to ensure that water droplet sizes were equivalent in both scenarios, thus guaranteeing an equivalent initial distribution. Intra-tracheal administration of [ 18 F]FES resulted in fast lung clearance, with 50%, 10% and 5% of the labelled compound remaining in the lungs at t=2, t=10 and t=40 minutes after administration, respectively (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter phenomenon has been described as condensation or rain out when running the nebulizer at high output into a confined exposure container. (23) The rain out process is also likely enhanced by the coalescence of primary droplets into more rapidly impacting/sedimenting larger droplets in the very concentrated and turbulent aerosol plume generated. It is worth to note, however, that at the full wet aerosol output, the humidity in the carrier air of such aerosols should attain equilibrium with the droplets undergoing only minor changes in droplet sizes, irrespective of the carrier being supplied dry or humidified.…”
Section: Exposures With Dried Nebulizer Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is most likely the secondary air entrainment flow patterns established around the nebulizer head when operated at full output that causes the large substance losses when connected for single rodent exposures in confined spaces. This phenomenon is sometimes labeled condensation, (23) but is more likely caused by aerosol coalescence, impaction, and sedimentation of larger aerosol droplets generated in the local flow patterns of highly concentrated aerosol established around the nebulizer head. At a substantially reduced output the generated aerosol can instead be easily contained within a carrier airstream optimally matched for either exposing single rodents without rebreathing problems or for not bypassing the animal with too much aerosol.…”
Section: Exposures With Dried Nebulizer Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation