1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.16.706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Tests ofTInvariance in Electromagnetic Transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does neither imply time-reversal noninvariance nor CP violation if CP T is assumed. When loop corrections are included, T -odd correlations can arise either from absorptive parts in the amplitude (so-called final state interactions [8]), or from CP violation. The former effect is a consequence of the unitarity of the S-matrix, and it can be eliminated either by taking the difference between the process we are interested in and its CP conjugate [9] or by direct estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does neither imply time-reversal noninvariance nor CP violation if CP T is assumed. When loop corrections are included, T -odd correlations can arise either from absorptive parts in the amplitude (so-called final state interactions [8]), or from CP violation. The former effect is a consequence of the unitarity of the S-matrix, and it can be eliminated either by taking the difference between the process we are interested in and its CP conjugate [9] or by direct estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonzero difference would imply that nonvanishing asymmetry terms are actually present and that T invariance is violated. We find a difference, Ae= (0.4±3.2)X10- 4 , and conclude that no evidence for time-reversal violation is present. The standard deviation in the experimental value of the asymmetry difference can be translated into an error in the determination of the phase 77.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…(Deviations due to non-Hermiticity have been estimated to be extremely small. 4 ) Relevant experiments were first proposed by Lee and Yang 5 ; the theory was later worked out in more detail. [6][7][8] Actual experiments have been performed with $77 cascades, 9,10 with 7-7 cascades from oriented nuclei, 11 and with Mossbauer techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions for σ ± 0 and A ± SM are given by (24) and (19). For the functions C i we obtain 2 :…”
Section: Cp Violating Asymmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%