2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision-porous polyurethane elastomers engineered for application in pro-healing vascular grafts: Synthesis, fabrication and detailed biocompatibility assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Artificial vascular grafts with enough mechanical strength can resist blood pressure continuously [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. In the radial direction, the maximum stress, breaking strain, and modulus of TVGs were comparable to WSGs, while largely higher than those of ESGs, mainly due to the existence of circumferentially aligned fibers ( Figure 3 a–d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial vascular grafts with enough mechanical strength can resist blood pressure continuously [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. In the radial direction, the maximum stress, breaking strain, and modulus of TVGs were comparable to WSGs, while largely higher than those of ESGs, mainly due to the existence of circumferentially aligned fibers ( Figure 3 a–d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with the development of scaffold optimization tools, equally important is a rich availability of scaffold fabrication techniques and biopolymer choices, both of which promote parametric control for optimizations. Some recent developments in the graft fabrication include: 1) Shortening the production time for cell sheet self-assembly method ( von Bornstädt et al, 2018 ); 2) loading drugs, anti-thrombogenic or pro-regenerative molecules for electrospun grafts or 3D printed grafts ( Zhang et al, 2019 ; Domínguez-Robles et al, 2021 ); 3) refining decellularization protocols for reduced immunological responses ( Schneider et al, 2018 ; Valencia-Rivero et al, 2019 ; Kimicata et al, 2020 ; Lopera Higuita et al, 2021 ); 4) improving the precision of pore generation in scaffold ( Zhen et al, 2021 ); 5) enhancing recellularization for allogenic or xenogenic decellularized grafts ( Dahan et al, 2017 ; Lin et al, 2019 ; Fayon et al, 2021 ); 6) expediting degradation with scaffold composition ( Fukunishi et al, 2021 ) or textile technique ( Fukunishi et al, 2019 ) to enhance matrix remodeling; 7) mimicking the structure and/or composition of vascular ECM using electrochemical fabrication ( Nguyen et al, 2018 ) or an automated technology combining dip-spinning with solution blow spinning ( Akentjew et al, 2019 ); 8) creating patient-specific grafts ( Fukunishi et al, 2017 ); and 9) hybrid approaches, for example, combining electrospinning with decellularized matrices ( Gong et al, 2016 ; Ran et al, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Counteracting Adverse Remodeling With Regenerative Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the mechanical dynamics, material features such as the structure and morphology of the scaffolds have received increasing attention for tissue regeneration [ [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] ]. Pore sizes within the implanted material have been accepted as an important factor influencing macrophage polarization, which further regulate tissue regeneration including vascular remodeling [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%