2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Oncology: The Road Ahead

Abstract: Current efforts in precision oncology largely focus on the benefit of genomics-guided therapy. Yet, advances in sequencing techniques provide an unprecedented view of the complex genetic and non-genetic heterogeneity within individual tumors. Herein, we outline the benefits of integrating genomic and transcriptomic analyses for advanced precision oncology. We summarize relevant computational approaches to detect novel drivers and genetic vulnerabilities, suitable for therapeutic exploration. Clinically relevan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
(267 reference statements)
1
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequencing ctDNA can illustrate intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity and tumor clonal hierarchy within individual patients. 181 Analysis of variations in ctDNA can be used to screen for subgroups of mutations including stem mutations and private mutations. 182 Stem mutations occur during the first stages of tumorigenesis and are present in all tumor cells.…”
Section: Primary Tumor Localization and Capturing Intra/intertumoramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing ctDNA can illustrate intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity and tumor clonal hierarchy within individual patients. 181 Analysis of variations in ctDNA can be used to screen for subgroups of mutations including stem mutations and private mutations. 182 Stem mutations occur during the first stages of tumorigenesis and are present in all tumor cells.…”
Section: Primary Tumor Localization and Capturing Intra/intertumoramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above information, we associated the 281 SNPs linked with breast cancer risk to 334 genes with a score ranging from 0 to 4 ( Supplementary Table 4): SNPs with low (0-1), intermediate (2) and high (3)(4) functional score were 30 (10.7%), 68 (24.2%), and 183 (65.1%), respectively. In order to exclude genes with low level of evidence of association with breast cancer risk SNPs, we further considered only SNPs with a score equal or greater than 2 (n=251).…”
Section: Breast Cancer Predisposition Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is a multifactorial disease stemming from a complex interplay between environmental, reproductive/endocrine and genetic risk factors. Dissecting the genetic architecture of breast cancer susceptibility is a pivotal step to understand the cascade of molecular events underlying breast carcinogenesis, which ultimately could lead to better preventive and therapeutic strategies according to the precision medicine principles (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ME can indicate functional redundancy or Synthetic Lethality (SL) [16]. SL interactions between two genes is a condition where the loss of either gene is viable but the loss of both is lethal, and has been considered a foundation for development of targeted anticancer therapies [7,39]. Such interactions across pathways can result in cross-talk between pathways [29,45] and methods have been developed to identify such between-pathway motifs [6,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%