2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08282-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of MRI radiomics features in the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, one study showed that intra-reader tumoral and peritumoral reproducibility were greatest in MRI[ 88 ]. Another study showed that for test-retest (same MRI system, 2 different MRI exams), the intraclass correlation coefficient varied from 0.53-0.99 and the inter-platform reproducibility (MRI systems from 2 different vendors) varied from 0.58-0.99[ 89 ]. Regarding different contrast phases, Ibrahim et al [ 90 ] showed that 25% of extracted features had a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) > 0.9 across arterial and portal venous phases.…”
Section: Radiomics Reproducibility In Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, one study showed that intra-reader tumoral and peritumoral reproducibility were greatest in MRI[ 88 ]. Another study showed that for test-retest (same MRI system, 2 different MRI exams), the intraclass correlation coefficient varied from 0.53-0.99 and the inter-platform reproducibility (MRI systems from 2 different vendors) varied from 0.58-0.99[ 89 ]. Regarding different contrast phases, Ibrahim et al [ 90 ] showed that 25% of extracted features had a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) > 0.9 across arterial and portal venous phases.…”
Section: Radiomics Reproducibility In Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide and the sixth most common cancer overall [398]. MRI is superior to CT in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy [399] and can be used to determine the differential diagnosis [400][401][402], variant analysis [403], arterial phase hyperenhancement [404], small precursor and recurrent lesions [405,406], liver perfusion [407], histological grade, microvascular invasion status, local and systemic therapeutic responses, prognosis [408,409], and as a preoperative marker [410] in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. PET/MRI imaging is also used for the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [411][412][413], whereas multi-phasic MRI staging was found to be more accurate than the straight hepatocellular carcinomagrading approach [414].…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to the overall tendency to perform and publish explorative radiomics studies based on the novelty of the topic rather than to improve the strict methodology and workflow of radiomics analysis [ 52 , 58 ]. Standardization of the acquisition protocols in liver imaging is a fundamental effort in order to minimize the variability of radiomics features across centers and scanners [ 59 ]. Furthermore, the International Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) is working toward standardization of extraction of quantitative features extracted from medical images and it already provided reference values for radiomics features on CT [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%