2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definitions of craniofacial landmarks and measurements are provided in Table . Craniofacial morphology was analysed in three different planes—transverse, vertical and anteroposterior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitions of craniofacial landmarks and measurements are provided in Table . Craniofacial morphology was analysed in three different planes—transverse, vertical and anteroposterior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, landmark plotting on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was demonstrably precise and reliable, 6 regardless of the head orientation. 7 Therefore, various studies have proposed different landmark-based MSPs: Damstra et al 8 suggested the MSP perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane passing through the nasion (N) and sella; Green et al 9 recommended the MSP that passes through N, incisive foramen (IF), and basion (Ba); and Shin et al 10 proposed the MSP that features the N, anterior nasal spine (ANS), and posterior nasal spine (PNS). Although these diverse planes can be used to diagnose facial asymmetry, it is necessary to define one reference plane that can best approximate the true symmetrical MSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume-rendered image was reoriented to make FH plane and transorbital plane horizontal although Gupta et al opined that such reorientations does not enhance the precision of landmark plotting. [ 28 ] CBCT allows clinically accurate and reliable 3D linear measurements of the craniofacial complex[ 29 ] and allows addition of new parameters postscan unlike USG. [ 15 ] Both hard and its homologous soft tissue images can be visualized simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D reconstructions along with transplanar cross-sections help in accurate identification of the landmark. [ 28 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%