The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00476-7_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision of Iatroscan Method for Assessment of SARA Compounds in Bitumen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the SARA group‐type composition results obtained using the procedures IP decr and GUT decr can be considered as definitely more representative for the investigated asphalts and VR. To obtain satisfying reproducibility, it is necessary to ensure compliance with the subsequent steps of the procedure, as its results are affected by the weight of the sample applied to the rod, scanning speed, age of the prepared solution, and the degree of wear of the Chromarod rods [23]. The repeatability values expressed by the standard deviation of the mean value (Supporting Material Appendix A1) and the calculated values of the CIs (Supporting Material Appendix A2, Figure 2B) are similar for all separation conditions tested including the standardized IP 469 methodology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the SARA group‐type composition results obtained using the procedures IP decr and GUT decr can be considered as definitely more representative for the investigated asphalts and VR. To obtain satisfying reproducibility, it is necessary to ensure compliance with the subsequent steps of the procedure, as its results are affected by the weight of the sample applied to the rod, scanning speed, age of the prepared solution, and the degree of wear of the Chromarod rods [23]. The repeatability values expressed by the standard deviation of the mean value (Supporting Material Appendix A1) and the calculated values of the CIs (Supporting Material Appendix A2, Figure 2B) are similar for all separation conditions tested including the standardized IP 469 methodology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractionation analysis was carried out by making use of a methodology that combines thin layer chromatography (TLC, LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and flame ionization detection (FID, LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. TLC allows the separation of SARA fractions (saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes) through their successive elution in solvents of increasing polarity, while FID allows for the quantification of the relative amounts of the four fractions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such research demonstrated that a minor increase in the percentage of PEFs from 1.5 % to 1.75 % corresponded with an STS and tensile strain enhancement by approximately 15 % and 6 % [ 148 ]. In comparison, another research found an increase in STS and tensile strain up to a PEFs of 1 %, after which both started to decline [ 154 ]. The introduction of 1 % PEFs (by vol.)…”
Section: Impacts Of Parameters Related To Fibers On Uhpgpcmentioning
confidence: 99%