2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.87.173002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Microwave Measurement of the23P123

Abstract: The 2(3)P(1)-to- 2(3)P(0) interval in atomic helium is measured using a thermal beam of metastable helium atoms excited to the 2(3)P state using a 1.08-microm diode laser. The 2(3)P(1)-to- 2(3)P(0) transition is driven by 29.6-GHz microwaves in a rectangular waveguide cavity. Our result of 29,616,950.9+/-0.9 kHz is the most precise measurement of helium 2(3)P fine structure. When compared to precise theory for this interval, this measurement leads to a determination of the fine-structure constant of 1/137.0359… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different high-precision spectroscopy approaches ranging from optically-pumped magnetic resonance microwave spectroscopy (Borbely et al, 2009;George et al, 2001) to heterodyne frequency differences of the 1083 nm transitions (Giusfredi et al, 2005;Smiciklas and Shiner, 2010;Zelevinsky et al, 2005) have produced sub-kHz accuracy 2 3 P fine structure measurements with a remarkable agreement among them. In particular the recently reported 9 ppb accurate value for the largest interval ∆ν 2 3 P0−2 = 31 908 131.25 (30) kHz, would lead to an uncertainty of 4.5 ppb in the inferred value of α if the theory were exact (Smiciklas and Shiner, 2010).…”
Section: Spectroscopic Measurements Of Atomic Properties a Metasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different high-precision spectroscopy approaches ranging from optically-pumped magnetic resonance microwave spectroscopy (Borbely et al, 2009;George et al, 2001) to heterodyne frequency differences of the 1083 nm transitions (Giusfredi et al, 2005;Smiciklas and Shiner, 2010;Zelevinsky et al, 2005) have produced sub-kHz accuracy 2 3 P fine structure measurements with a remarkable agreement among them. In particular the recently reported 9 ppb accurate value for the largest interval ∆ν 2 3 P0−2 = 31 908 131.25 (30) kHz, would lead to an uncertainty of 4.5 ppb in the inferred value of α if the theory were exact (Smiciklas and Shiner, 2010).…”
Section: Spectroscopic Measurements Of Atomic Properties a Metasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we include the atomic fine structure in the Hamiltonian [18], the coupling gives rise to three distinct asymptotes and to anti-crossings between attractive and repulsive curves, leading to purely long-range potential wells [25]. We construct the fine-structure coupling phenomenologically from 2 3 P splittings that have been measured accurately [19,20]. If there is no rotation, only the projection Ω of the total electronic angular momentum on the molecular axis remains a good quantum number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, experiment and theory are in reasonable agreement, although for many energy levels the theoretical uncertainties are smaller than the experimental ones. In a few important cases significant discrepancies arise, most notably for the fine structure of the 2 3 P state [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Of special interest is the ionization energy (IE) of the ground 1 1 S 0 state of 4 He, which provides a sensitive test of QED corrections for a two-electron system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few important cases significant discrepancies arise, most notably for the fine structure of the 2 3 P state [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Of special interest is the ionization energy (IE) of the ground 1 1 S 0 state of 4 He, which provides a sensitive test of QED corrections for a two-electron system. It is known experimentally to about 45 MHz, a fractional accuracy of 9 × 10 −9 , and the most recent theoretical calculation has surpassed this with an estimated uncertainty of 36 MHz [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation