2002
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2002.10875115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Measurements of Prompt Neutron Spectra in240Pu and242Pu Spontaneous Fission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reaction 239 Pu(nth,f) neutron yield comes mostly from J  = 0 + states, same as in 240 Pu(sf) spontaneous fission neutron spectra (SFNS). Comparison of PFNS of 239 Pu(nth,f) and SFNS of 240 Pu(sf) [9] in [1] shows that at ε<0.2 MeV PFNS and SFNS of fissioning nuclide 240 Pu depend only weakly on the excitation energy, while at ε≳ E the PFNS of 239 Pu(nth,f) is much harder than SFNS. The same happens in case of calculated 241 Pu(nth,f) PFNS and 242 Pu(sf) [9].…”
Section: Pu(nf) Prompt Fission Neutron Spectramentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reaction 239 Pu(nth,f) neutron yield comes mostly from J  = 0 + states, same as in 240 Pu(sf) spontaneous fission neutron spectra (SFNS). Comparison of PFNS of 239 Pu(nth,f) and SFNS of 240 Pu(sf) [9] in [1] shows that at ε<0.2 MeV PFNS and SFNS of fissioning nuclide 240 Pu depend only weakly on the excitation energy, while at ε≳ E the PFNS of 239 Pu(nth,f) is much harder than SFNS. The same happens in case of calculated 241 Pu(nth,f) PFNS and 242 Pu(sf) [9].…”
Section: Pu(nf) Prompt Fission Neutron Spectramentioning
confidence: 97%
“…240 Pu(nth,f) PFNS and SFNS of 240 Pu(sf)[9], the former being harder at ε≳ E . The 239 Pu(n,f) PFNS data at En~1.5 MeV[2] are consistent with hardening of the calculated PFNS with increase of En .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In reaction 239 Pu(nth, f) neutrons yield mostly from  J = 0 + states, same as in 240 Pu(sf) spontaneous fission neutron spectra (SFNS). Comparison of PFNS of 239 Pu(nth, f) and SFNS of 240 Pu(sf) [7] in [5,6] shows that at ε<0.2 MeV PFNS and SFNS of fissioning nuclide 240 Pu depend only weakly on the excitation energy, while at ε≳ E the PFNS of 239 Pu(nth, f) is much harder than SFNS of 240 Pu(sf). The same happens in case of calculated 241 Pu(nth, f) PFNS and measured SFNS of 242 Pu(sf) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of PFNS of 239 Pu(nth, f) and SFNS of 240 Pu(sf) [7] in [5,6] shows that at ε<0.2 MeV PFNS and SFNS of fissioning nuclide 240 Pu depend only weakly on the excitation energy, while at ε≳ E the PFNS of 239 Pu(nth, f) is much harder than SFNS of 240 Pu(sf). The same happens in case of calculated 241 Pu(nth, f) PFNS and measured SFNS of 242 Pu(sf) [7]. For a pair of reactions 240 Pu(nth, f)& 241 Pu(sf) such augmentation is hardly would be ever possible, though some guidance stems from comparing a pair of spectra of 240 Pu(nth, f)& 240 Pu(sf).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of some nuclides are presented in the Tables 2 and 3 in comparison with [17][18][19]. Neutron spectral measurements have been reported [6] for two mixtures, one contains 227 AcO2 with daughter products and the second contains dioxide 244 CmO2 mixed with 13 C powder target material and [7] for 210 Po- 13 C source of neutrons .…”
Section: Icrs-13 and Rpsd-2016 7033mentioning
confidence: 99%