2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab4f21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision measurements of Hausdorff dimensions in two-dimensional quantum gravity

Abstract: Two-dimensional quantum gravity, defined either via scaling limits of random discrete surfaces or via Liouville quantum gravity, is known to possess a geometry that is genuinely fractal with a Hausdorff dimension equal to 4. Coupling gravity to a statistical system at criticality changes the fractal properties of the geometry in a way that depends on the central charge of the critical system. Establishing the dependence of the Hausdorff dimension on this central charge c has been an important open problem in p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1.17) Recent numerical simulations [BB19] fit much better with (1.17) than with (1.16); and unlike (1.16) the formula (1.17) is consistent with all rigorously known bounds. However, there is currently no theoretical justification for (1.17) (even at a heuristic level).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…(1.17) Recent numerical simulations [BB19] fit much better with (1.17) than with (1.16); and unlike (1.16) the formula (1.17) is consistent with all rigorously known bounds. However, there is currently no theoretical justification for (1.17) (even at a heuristic level).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The formula (1.2) is consistent with all known bounds for d γ . Moreover, recent numerical simulations by Barkley and Budd [BB19] fit much more closely with (1.2) than with (1.1). However, there is currently no theoretical justification, even at a heuristic level, for (1.2).…”
Section: Introduction 1overviewmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As one of its most intricate features, the composite operator formalism employed in this work could act as a connector between Asymptotic Safety [22,23] and more geometric approaches to quantum gravity based on causal dynamical triangulations [80,81] or random geometry. In d = 2 dimensions, a natural benchmark would involve a quantitative comparison of scaling properties associated with the geodesic length recently considered in Pagani and Reuter [19], Becker and Pagani [29,30], Becker et al [31], and Houthoff et al [32] and exact computations for random discrete surfaces in the absence of matter fields [21,82] as well as rigorous and numerical bounds arising from Liouville Gravity in the presence of matter [83,84]. On the renormalization group side this will involve taking limits akin to Nink and Reuter [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%