1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90101-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision measurement of the 2p-1s transition in muonic 12C: Search for new muon-nucleon interactions or accurate determination of the rms nuclear charge radius

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16]. Using the numerical procedure of determination of E gs , E r , and R (1) , the parameters of the three-body potential for each two-body potential were determined by solving the nonlinear inverse problem of fixing the ground-and excited-state energies and the excited-state rms radius at the experimental values E gs = −7.2747 MeV, E r = 0.3795 MeV [22], and R (1) exp = 2.48 ± 0.22 fm [23,24]. At the first stage of the calculations only the one-term potential (V 1 = 0) was studied for better understanding of the dependence on the three-body potential V is lower than R (1) exp , nevertheless, Γ and M 12 are in better agreement with experiment than in the previous case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16]. Using the numerical procedure of determination of E gs , E r , and R (1) , the parameters of the three-body potential for each two-body potential were determined by solving the nonlinear inverse problem of fixing the ground-and excited-state energies and the excited-state rms radius at the experimental values E gs = −7.2747 MeV, E r = 0.3795 MeV [22], and R (1) exp = 2.48 ± 0.22 fm [23,24]. At the first stage of the calculations only the one-term potential (V 1 = 0) was studied for better understanding of the dependence on the three-body potential V is lower than R (1) exp , nevertheless, Γ and M 12 are in better agreement with experiment than in the previous case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter α p,n = 2/3 has been fixed. The parameters a p and a n are fitted to reproduce the charge and matter radii of 12 C. The experimental charge radius 2.4829 ± 0.0019 fm [40], and the experimental matter radius 2.35 ± 0.02 fm from Refs. [41,42] have been used in our calculations, leading to a p = 1.6868 and a n = 1.5008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the large proton separation energies of the carbon isotopes, the proton radii remain nearly constant in the range of 2.3-2.4 fm. Assuming the charge radius of the proton to be 0.85 fm, we find that the charge radii of 12,13,14 C are 2.48, 2.47 and 2.52 fm, respectively, which are compared to the experimental values [40], 2.4715, 2.4795 and 2.4962 fm. The agreement with experiment is very good.…”
Section: Density With a Slater Determinantmentioning
confidence: 97%