Proceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016) 2017
DOI: 10.22323/1.282.0467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Measurement of $\sin^{2}(2\theta_{13})$ and $|\Delta m^{2}_{ee}|$ from Daya Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since these experiments are not sensitive to θ 12 (see probability expressions in [74]), we consider an external Gaußian prior of 0.7% (at 1σ) on sin 2 θ 12 as expected from the proposed JUNO experiment [75]. Even though both DUNE and T2HK can provide high precision measurement of θ 13 using their appearance channels, but to speed up our computation, we also apply a Gaußian prior of 3% (at 1σ) on sin 2 θ 13 as expected by the end of Daya Bay's run [76]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since these experiments are not sensitive to θ 12 (see probability expressions in [74]), we consider an external Gaußian prior of 0.7% (at 1σ) on sin 2 θ 12 as expected from the proposed JUNO experiment [75]. Even though both DUNE and T2HK can provide high precision measurement of θ 13 using their appearance channels, but to speed up our computation, we also apply a Gaußian prior of 3% (at 1σ) on sin 2 θ 13 as expected by the end of Daya Bay's run [76]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also marginalise over test sin 2 θ 13 in its present 3σ allowed range of 0.019 to 0.024. While doing so, we apply an external Gaußian prior of 3% (at 1σ) on this parameter expecting that the Daya Bay experiment would be able to achieve this precision by the end of its run [76]. Both DUNE and T2HK can measure θ 13 with high precision using ν µ → ν e andν µ →ν e oscillation channels and therefore, the prior on θ 13 is not very crucial in our study (see Fig.…”
Section: Details Of Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7 we present results of statistical analysis of the predictions for cos δ , namely the likelihood function versus cos δ within the Gaussian approximation (see [96] for details) performed using the b.f.v. of the mixing angles given in Table 1 and the prospective 1σ uncertainties i) of 0.7% on sin 2 θ 12 , planned to be reached in JUNO experiment [119], ii) of 3% on sin 2 θ 13 , foreseen to be obtained in the Daya Bay experiment [131], and iii) of 3% on sin 2 θ 23 , expected to be reached in the currently running and future planned long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments [117,120,122]. The BM (LC) case is very sensitive to the b.f.v.…”
Section: Neutrino Theorymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Statistical analysis of these 14 cases was performed in [98] using the b.f.v. of the three neutrino mixing parameters sin 2 θ i j from [19] and taking into account the prospective (1σ ) uncertainties in the determination of the mixing angles, planned to be achieved in currently running (Daya Bay [131]) and the next generation (JUNO [119], T2HK [120], DUNE [122]) of neutrino oscillation experiments: 3% on sin 2 θ 13 [131], 0.7% on sin 2 θ 12 [119] and 3% on sin 2 θ 23 [122,120]. This analysis revealed that only six cases would be compatible with the indicated prospective data from the Daya Bay, JUNO, T2HK, DUNE experiments.…”
Section: Neutrino Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These uncertainties are foreseen to be further reduced by the currently active and/or future planned experiments. The Daya Bay collaboration plans to determine sin 2 θ 13 with 1σ uncertainty of 3% [45]. The uncertainties on sin 2 θ 12 and sin 2 θ 23 are planned to be reduced significantly.…”
Section: Jhep12(2017)022mentioning
confidence: 99%