Precision measurement of cylinder straightness using a scanning multi-probe system

Gao, Wei; Yokoyama, J.; Kojima, H.; Kiyono, Satoshi

doi:10.1016/s0141-6359(02)00106-x

Cited by 103 publications

(63 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The presence of zero-adjustment errors originates a parabolic error term in the profile result of the measured artefact. In addition, probe position cannot be easily adjusted even with the help of a sufficiently accurate reference flat surface (Gao et al, 2002). Figure 3 illustrates the zero-adjustment errors of the three sensors in the probing device.…”

Section: Multi-probe Error Separation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of an automated and dedicated measuring system for straightness evaluation

Paziani¹,

Giacomo²,

Tsunaki³

2007

J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work presents an automated and dedicated system aiming at the measurement of straightness errors of mechanical components, using an industrial robot. A multi-probe error separation technique was used to make measurements independent from the coordinate system of the robot. A mathematical model that takes into account the readings from three sensors was specifically designed for the proposed measurements and produces inspection results by means of the solution of a system of linear equations, in only one operation. Also in this work, a new approach was developed to minimize the influence of the zero-adjustment errors of the sensors, which represent the major source of errors in the separation process. Experimental tests applied to the measurement of straightness errors of mechanical components were accomplished, which demonstrated the effectiveness of the employed methodology.

show abstract

Section: Multi-probe Error Separation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4(a). However, minimal discrepancies between the zero values of the three sensors (with relation to an ideal flat surface) produce a large deleterious parabolic error term on the final profile result (Gao et al, 2002).…”

Section: Zero-adjustment Errors and The Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of an automated and dedicated measuring system for straightness evaluation

Paziani¹,

Giacomo²,

Tsunaki³

2007

J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are common, for instance, in the automotive, power, paper and shipbuilding industries; therefore, one of the most significant metrological tasks today is to ensure maximum accuracy of roundness and cylindricity measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A problem of optimal cylindricity profile matching

Janecki¹,

Zwierzchowski²,

Cedro³

2015

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The bird-cage strategy used for measuring cylindricity is reported to be the most effective, as it provides the most detailed information about an analyzed object. The average values of profiles measured with the cross-section and the generatrix strategies may differ slightly, yet this may result from some design imperfections of the measurement instruments used. In this study, the problem of optimal profile matching is formulated and solved. As a result, the differences between the values of the registered profiles at the points of intersection of the scanning trajectories can be minimized.

show abstract

“…This is often referred to as the parallelism of the two rails. There are several methods that are used to obtain a measure of the straightness of each rail [1,2], such as the reversal [3][4][5], sequential two-point [6][7][8][9][10][11], and multi-probe [12][13][14][15][16] methods. These methods generally acquire deviation profiles by eliminating a linear fitted inclined curve; however, they seldom provide information about the relative distance between the pair of rails [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A three-probe system for measuring the parallelism and straightness of a pair of rails for ultra-precision guideways

Hwang

Park

Gao

et al. 2007

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Precision measurement of cylinder straightness using a scanning multi-probe system

Cited by 103 publications

References 21 publications

Development of an automated and dedicated measuring system for straightness evaluation

Development of an automated and dedicated measuring system for straightness evaluation

A problem of optimal cylindricity profile matching

A three-probe system for measuring the parallelism and straightness of a pair of rails for ultra-precision guideways

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About