“…MS is predominantly used for peptide mapping and identification of cysteine residues and disulfide bonds after enzymatic digestion, reduction, and derivatization . MS, however, has limitations in determining the proper disulfide connectivity when suitable cleavage sites of digestive enzymes such as Arg/Lys for trypsin, Phe/Tyr/Trp for chymotrypsin, and Ser/Ala/Val for elastase are absent. , Other approaches, which do not require enzymatic digestion such as online electrochemical cells connected to MS, exist and were also reported to be used for disulfide bridge elucidation. − Recent improvements in MS fragmentation and detection approaches such as ion mobility and trapped ion mobility as well as in source decay were developed and also involved in disulfide bridge identification, especially for vicinal cysteines. − The elucidation of the disulfide connectivity then requires an accurate evaluation of the fragment pattern and the contained disulfide bonds. ,, In addition, MS data evaluation of complex samples or unknown sequences could be a difficult task due to the high number of fragments that may require specific expertise and extensive time for correct evaluation. ,− The loss of significant fragments being involved in a disulfide bridge, especially in case of low concentrated samples, can dramatically affect the final assessment. − Finally, although MS is a widely used tool for elucidating posttranslational modifications, it may not provide adequate differentiation between all possible isomers of a multiple disulfide-bonded peptide. ,,,, Therefore, all analytical methods available should be exhausted to determine the correct disulfide connectivity and also to provide quantitative information as required. Edman degradation (ED), which was introduced in the 1950s, is a method developed for the analysis of the primary amino acid sequence of a peptide (aa n ) (for a comparison between tandem MS and ED regarding the determination of the disulfide connectivity in disulfide-rich peptides and proteins see Table S1).…”