2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.042501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48

Abstract: Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline">mrow>mmultiscripts>mrow>mi>Ca/mi>/ mrow>mprescripts>/mprescripts>none>/none>mrow>mn >48/mn>/mrow>/mmultiscripts>/mrow>/math> D. Adhikari et al. (CREX Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of 48 Ca, the softening of the symmetry energy post-refinement moves the theoretical prediction in the direction of the experiment, but not nearly as much as it is required. That is, the neutron skin thickness of 48 Ca, goes down from R 48 skin = 0.231 fm to R 48 skin = 0.197 fm, which remains far from the quoted CREX value of R 48 skin = 0.121 (35) fm [25]. It is important to note that after refinement the theoretical uncertainty in both R 208 skin and R 48 skin is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Neutron Skinsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of 48 Ca, the softening of the symmetry energy post-refinement moves the theoretical prediction in the direction of the experiment, but not nearly as much as it is required. That is, the neutron skin thickness of 48 Ca, goes down from R 48 skin = 0.231 fm to R 48 skin = 0.197 fm, which remains far from the quoted CREX value of R 48 skin = 0.121 (35) fm [25]. It is important to note that after refinement the theoretical uncertainty in both R 208 skin and R 48 skin is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Neutron Skinsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, this correlation is in stark disagreement with experiment. The CREX collaboration has recently reported a neutron skin thickness in 48 Ca [25] that is significantly smaller than any theoretical prediction that reproduces the large value of the neutron skin in 208 Pb. Finally, the historic detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration from the binary neutron star coalescence GW170817 suggests that the EOS is soft in the vicinity of 2ρ 0 [16], although a reanalysis [26] could accommodate a stiffer EOS that brings the radius of a 1.4 M neutron star into agreement with the NICER results [17,18] and with other constraints obtained from the analysis of the electromagnetic counterpart [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, considering the large deviation in the L 0 distribution from PREX-II, different analyses from laboratory experiments and astrophysical data could be compatible with each other. For example, the joint analysis of PREX-II and the more recent CREX (Adhikari et al 2022) Figure 4 compares and contrasts the 90% confidence intervals of the EOSs for all the analyses. The contour of the GW170817/AT2017gfo + NICER analysis is denoted by the green-shaded region, while the other contours are denoted by the dashed lines.…”
Section: Parameters Of the Nuclear Eos And The Properties Of The Neut...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…combining the original Lead Radius EXperiment (PREX) result with the updated PREX2 result [2][3][4]. As for 48 Ca, the CREX group presented [5] r 48 skin (CREX) = 0.121 ± 0.026 (exp) ± 0.024 (model) = 0.071 ∼ 0.171 fm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%