2012
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/49/3/294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision comparison of the quantum Hall effect in graphene and gallium arsenide

Abstract: The half-integer quantum Hall effect in epitaxial graphene is compared with high precision to the well known integer effect in a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure. We find no difference between the quantised resistance values within the relative standard uncertainty of our measurement of 8.7 × 10 −11 . The result places new tighter limits on any possible correction terms to the simple relation R K = h/e 2 , and also demonstrates that epitaxial graphene samples are suitable for application as electrical resistance st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since grain sizes in graphene made by chemical vapor deposition are usually small, this may help explain why the quantum Hall effect is usually poorly developed in devices made of this material. The half-integer quantum Hall effect (QHE) [1,2] in monolayer graphene grown on silicon-carbide substrates has been observed to metrological accuracy [3][4][5]. Very high breakdown currents have been recorded, and quantization remains accurate also at elevated temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since grain sizes in graphene made by chemical vapor deposition are usually small, this may help explain why the quantum Hall effect is usually poorly developed in devices made of this material. The half-integer quantum Hall effect (QHE) [1,2] in monolayer graphene grown on silicon-carbide substrates has been observed to metrological accuracy [3][4][5]. Very high breakdown currents have been recorded, and quantization remains accurate also at elevated temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In particular, graphene grown on the Si-face of SiC (SiC/G) has been the material of choice for the fabrication of graphene-based high performance electronic devices such as high-frequency analogue transistors, 4 sensors, 5 and quantum resistance standards. [6][7][8][9][10] In SiC/G, the two-dimensional system is formed by graphene situated on top of a non-conducting buffer carbon layer (the 0-layer), covalently bonded to SiC. Charge transfer between graphene and the localised donor states in the buffer, driven by the work function difference A $ 1 eV, leads to a significant electron density in the as grown SiC/G, typically n $ 10 13 cm À2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 On the other hand, the SiC/G-substrate charge transfer leads to a robust quantum Hall quantization, making this material a superior embodiment of the quantum resistance standard compared to conventional GaAs heterostructures. 7,12 Charge transfer from the substrate manifests in quantum magnetotransport as anomalously wide quantum Hall plateaux and high breakdown currents that have lead to the most accurate resistance quantization measurements to-date. 7 The ideal technique for carrier density control would preserve the rich interplay between the graphene layer and the substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 The observation of the quantum Hall effect in graphene presented exciting new opportunities for metrology, 1,5 since the unique electronic structure of graphene leads to an exceptionally robust QHE, observable even at room temperature. 6 In a recent direct comparison experiment between SiC/G and GaAs (the present system of choice for QHR), 2 the QHR was found to agree with a relative uncertainty of 10 −10 . The accuracy of this comparison was limited by the lower breakdown current in the GaAs device (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%