1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01473120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PreciseQ ? -values with an intrinsic Germanium detector for light, neutron-rich fission products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
3
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For 93Rb there is a discrepancy of about two standard deviations between our value and those reported in [4] and [16]. In the cases of 95'96'97Rb large deviations with the original results from [4] exist.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For 93Rb there is a discrepancy of about two standard deviations between our value and those reported in [4] and [16]. In the cases of 95'96'97Rb large deviations with the original results from [4] exist.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…The error bars in Table 1 consist of the sum of a systematic error (mainly the calibration uncertainty) and [4]. For 93Rb there is a discrepancy of about two standard deviations between our value and those reported in [4] and [16].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This a 1 value corresponds to a slope in the ratio of corrected electron spectrum to uncorrected one of +6% MeV −1 . While there have been high-quality measurements of shape factors for light nuclides, most notably for 12 B obtaining an a 1 value of +0.48% MeV −1 [38], only Q-values and strength functions derived from the electron spectra from nuclides relevant to the reactor anomaly, that is, end point energies larger than 3 MeV, have been reported [39,40]. Therefore, there is no experimental evidence that will allow us to rule out an a 1 value of 0.03.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%