2020
DOI: 10.3233/asy-191537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precised approximations in elliptic homogenization beyond the periodic setting

Abstract: We consider homogenization problems for linear elliptic equations in divergence form. The coefficients are assumed to be a local perturbation of some periodic background. We prove W 1,p and Lipschitz convergence of the two-scale expansion, with explicit rates. For this purpose, we use a corrector adapted to this particular setting, and defined in [10,11], and apply the same strategy of proof as Avellaneda and Lin in [1]. We also propose an abstract setting generalizing our particular assumptions for which the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
54
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In (4), the corrector employed is the function w p solution to the corrector equation (7), the existence and uniqueness (up to additive constants) of which has been established in our previous works [3,4]. Such a corrector is different from the periodic corrector, and although intuitively one could have thought, based on the observation that the presence of a does not modify the homogenized equation (2), that the periodic corrector w per p would give an equally accurate approximation, it does not. The rates of convergence obtained are made precise in our main result, namely Théorème 2.1 of the French version, and estimates (10) through (12) in various norms.…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In (4), the corrector employed is the function w p solution to the corrector equation (7), the existence and uniqueness (up to additive constants) of which has been established in our previous works [3,4]. Such a corrector is different from the periodic corrector, and although intuitively one could have thought, based on the observation that the presence of a does not modify the homogenized equation (2), that the periodic corrector w per p would give an equally accurate approximation, it does not. The rates of convergence obtained are made precise in our main result, namely Théorème 2.1 of the French version, and estimates (10) through (12) in various norms.…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In passing, and as is also the case in the proof of the periodic case, we establish estimates for the Green function G ǫ of the original problem (see (32), (33), (34) of the French version) and its convergence to the (possibily corrected) Green function of the homogenized problem (2) (see (28)). The details of the results announced in this Note are given in our publications [2,12].…”
Section: Abridged English Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations