2015
DOI: 10.1785/0120140329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Relative Earthquake Magnitudes from Cross Correlation

Abstract: We present a method to estimate precise relative magnitudes using cross correlation of seismic waveforms. Our method incorporates the intercorrelation of all events in a group of earthquakes, as opposed to individual event pairings relative to a reference event. This method works well when a reliable reference event does not exist. We illustrate the method using vertical strike-slip earthquakes located in the northeast Pacific and Panama fracture zone regions. Our results are generally consistent with the Glob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using relative magnitude calculations documented in Cleveland and Ammon [] and listed in Table S1, we estimate that the relative moments of the 1994 and 2008 events differ by about 10%, which is consistent with Boettcher and McGuire []. If we assume that the 2008 event is a repeat of the 1994 and there was no slip between events and each event released all the plate motion strain accumulated between the events, based on MORVEL [ DeMets et al ., ], the approximate seismic slip is ~64 cm (using ~49 mm/yr).…”
Section: Relative Relocation Results For the Northeast Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using relative magnitude calculations documented in Cleveland and Ammon [] and listed in Table S1, we estimate that the relative moments of the 1994 and 2008 events differ by about 10%, which is consistent with Boettcher and McGuire []. If we assume that the 2008 event is a repeat of the 1994 and there was no slip between events and each event released all the plate motion strain accumulated between the events, based on MORVEL [ DeMets et al ., ], the approximate seismic slip is ~64 cm (using ~49 mm/yr).…”
Section: Relative Relocation Results For the Northeast Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although future work could reestimate all event magnitudes as M w [e.g., Cleveland and Ammon , ], at this stage we elect to extend, rather than replace, the network magnitudes. Thus, cognizant of the trade‐offs, we adopt the pragmatic approach of empirically matching catalog magnitude scaling and extending this scaling to newly detected events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method differs from Rubinstein and Ellsworth (2010) who used singular value decomposition to measure relative amplitudes. To convert the relative amplitude measurements for all possible pairs and stations in a RES to absolute magnitudes we perform an inversion of the differential magnitudes similar to that in Cleveland and Ammon (2015). The inversion across stations helps suppress outliers due to unknown gain changes at a particular station.…”
Section: Relative Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%