Proceedings of the European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(EPS-HEP2015) 2016
DOI: 10.22323/1.234.0186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise predictions for Higgs-masses in the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM)

Abstract: The NMSSM represents an elegant and well motivated description for the observed phenomenology in high energy physics. In this model a scalar singlet together with its superpartner is added to the Higgs sector of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). In order to compare the NMSSM with experimental data at the same level of accuracy as the MSSM, precise predictions for Higgs-boson masses in the NMSSM are a necessity. This work will focus on the prediction for the Higgs masses in the NMSSM at one-and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that the Higgs mass predictions of NMSSMTools for very heavy sfermions may not be entirely reliable, as a resummation of large log( mQ m t ) may be necessary: such effects are addressed, e.g. in [88] but the details of the correspondence between the parameters and the spectrum are of secondary importance for our conclusions. Note that all the considered points satisfy the phenomenological tests implemented within NMSSMTools -except maybe (g − 2) μ (satisfied for P4 and P9) -and HiggsBounds within 2 σ .…”
Section: Benchmark Pointsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We observe that the Higgs mass predictions of NMSSMTools for very heavy sfermions may not be entirely reliable, as a resummation of large log( mQ m t ) may be necessary: such effects are addressed, e.g. in [88] but the details of the correspondence between the parameters and the spectrum are of secondary importance for our conclusions. Note that all the considered points satisfy the phenomenological tests implemented within NMSSMTools -except maybe (g − 2) μ (satisfied for P4 and P9) -and HiggsBounds within 2 σ .…”
Section: Benchmark Pointsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Nevertheless, quantum corrections were still shown to contribute significantly especially in the prediction of the SMlike Higgs boson mass [26,68,70,74,[78][79][80][81]. In this paper we will investigate how important the unique loop corrections of the μνSSM beyond the NMSSM are in realistic scenarios.…”
Section: The μνSsm Higgs Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the μνSSM Higgs scalar sector becomes evident when we compare the numbers of free parameters (30) with the one in the real MSSM (7) [55] and the NMSSM (12) [26]. While the number of free parameters is fixed, we are free to replace some of the parameters by physical parameters.…”
Section: Renormalization Of the Higgs Potential At One-loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The renormalization constants δ|λ|, δ|κ|, δφ λ , δφ κ , δξ , δξ s and δ|A κ | are fixed by DR conditions imposed on trilinear vertices involving scalar, CP-even Higgs fields φ 1,2,s , the singlinoS, and the charged higgsino fieldsH ± , in the interaction basis in analogy to the procedure outlined in [129]. The renormalization condition imposed on the renormalized three-point functionˆ i jk for three arbitrary fields i, j and k readŝ i jk denote the vertex function at the treelevel and one-loop order, respectively, and δ i jk denotes the counterterm.…”
Section: Renormalization Conditions At the One-loop Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%