2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19651-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Positioning and Heading for Autonomous Scouting Robots in a Harsh Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• It has been verified that the implementation of the relative localization algorithms is correct and its behaviour in simulation environment (with real data) is as expected: smooth solution, no unexpected jumps, able to cope with errors and uncertainty in sensors, etc. • In terms of repeatability and accuracy, the results of the open-sky test are coherent with the conclusions for the test in the greenhouse environment [9]. This was expected since the input of the relative localization is the robot absolute position and heading estimation (which is quite good in both cases) and relative sensor information (which is not affected for the change of environment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• It has been verified that the implementation of the relative localization algorithms is correct and its behaviour in simulation environment (with real data) is as expected: smooth solution, no unexpected jumps, able to cope with errors and uncertainty in sensors, etc. • In terms of repeatability and accuracy, the results of the open-sky test are coherent with the conclusions for the test in the greenhouse environment [9]. This was expected since the input of the relative localization is the robot absolute position and heading estimation (which is quite good in both cases) and relative sensor information (which is not affected for the change of environment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The relative localization algorithm relies on ROS [8] software for its implementation in the robot platform (for a detailed description see [9]. It uses the Gmapping algorithm (based on FastSLAM [10] for mapping and AMCL [ [11][12][13][14] for localisation.…”
Section: B Relative Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another industrial use of robotics that have achieved some importance in recent years is agriculture. In [108] the design and verification of the Greenpatrol localization subsystem is described. Greenpatrol is an autonomous robot system intended to operate in light indoor environments, such as greenhouses, detecting and treating pests in high-value crops such as tomato and pepper.…”
Section: Industrial Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work presents, similarly to [31], a decoupled mobile manipulation control for greenhouse related tasks using the ROS de-facto algorithms [27] and [28]. The navigation is based on latest robotic solutions which have proven to successfully use Galileo Satellites combined with IMU, odometry and range laser sensors for localization [8]. The control architecture follows the hybrid paradigm presented in [40], where rational and efficient deliberative decisions represented by an IPM strategy are combined with reactive behaviors represented by the different navigation, manipulation and vision modules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, robotic solutions combined with computer vision can be used to automate this repetitive inspection task, increasing the reliability, maximizing the health of crops and optimizing the use of pesticides to as little as 5%-10% [6]. For that purpose, robots need to implement plenty of different tasks such as localize themselves [7] and navigate inside greenhouses [8]- [9]; acquire quality pictures to identify pests and their locations [10]; or process the obtained results to generate efficient highlevel instructions to command the robot according to an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) system [11]. However, most research works focus on individual problems neglecting its integration within a single complete solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%