2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.012008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise measurement of neutrino and antineutrino differential cross sections

Abstract: The NuTeV experiment at Fermilab has obtained a unique high statistics sample of neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions using its high-energy sign-selected beam. We present a measurement of the differential cross section for charged-current neutrino and anti-neutrino scattering from iron. Structure functions, F2(x, Q 2 ) and xF3(x, Q 2 ), are determined by fitting the inelasticity, y, dependence of the cross sections. This measurement has significantly improved systematic precision as a consequence of more pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
154
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(31 reference statements)
11
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the strange sea was related to the light quark sea by an x-independent fraction [2][3][4], such assðxÞ ¼ r sd ðxÞ, and it is often assumed that the strange sea is suppressed such that r s ∼ 0.5. The evidence for this suppression comes from di-muon production in charged current data from the NuTeV [5], CCFR [6], and NOMAD [7] neutrino scattering experiments. These data provide constraints at larger x on the strange and also the antistrange densities through the subprocesses W þ s → c and W −s →c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the strange sea was related to the light quark sea by an x-independent fraction [2][3][4], such assðxÞ ¼ r sd ðxÞ, and it is often assumed that the strange sea is suppressed such that r s ∼ 0.5. The evidence for this suppression comes from di-muon production in charged current data from the NuTeV [5], CCFR [6], and NOMAD [7] neutrino scattering experiments. These data provide constraints at larger x on the strange and also the antistrange densities through the subprocesses W þ s → c and W −s →c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It constrains in particular the (valence) quark densities, as the gluon density enters only at next-to-leading order (NLO) and can thus only be determined from scaling violations. The decomposition of the light quark flavors can then be constrained by neutrino structure function data [12,13], and the strange quark density derived from dimuon production in neutrino DIS [14,15], while the charm structure function F c 2 , and to a lesser extent F b 2 for the bottom quark, are directly accessible at HERA [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting cross sections are consistent to better than 1% in every bin, which verifies that the extracted cross sections are insensitive to the initially assumed simulated fluxes. Figure 6 compares the measured isoscalar-corrected charged-current inclusive ν μ cross section to the MINOS [17], T2K [52][53][54], CCFR [15], Argoneut [55,56] IHEP-JINR [57], NOMAD [10], NuTeV [16], CDHS [58], and IHEP-ITEP [59] measurements. Not shown are the Gargamelle [60] and SciBooNE [6] results, which reported less precise neutrino cross sections within the plotted energy range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this analysis agree with the NOMAD and MINOS results within uncertainties, but extend to lower energies. Figure 6 also compares the measured isoscalar-corrected charged-currentν μ inclusive cross section to the MINOS [17], IHEP-ITEP [59], and IHEP-JINR [57], CCFR [15], Argoneut [55,56], NuTeV [16], and CDHS [58] measurements. Not shown are the Gargamelle [62] results, which reported less precise neutrino cross sections within the plotted energy range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%