2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11760-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise insertion and guided editing of higher plant genomes using Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases

Abstract: Precise genome editing of plants has the potential to reshape global agriculture through the targeted engineering of endogenous pathways or the introduction of new traits. To develop a CRISPR nuclease-based platform that would enable higher efficiencies of precise gene insertion or replacement, we screened the Cpf1 nucleases from Francisella novicida and Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 for their capability to induce targeted gene insertion via homology directed repair. Both nucleases, in the presence of a gui… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
132
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as cleavage occurs remote from the PAM and seed region, even after NHEJ-based small InDels are generated, further cleavage might still occur, which could still induce HR. In rice, using FnCas12a and LbCas12a targeted insertions via HR were accomplished and, at least for FnCas12a, with higher rates than SpCas9-based experiments [76]. Furthermore, when delivered as pre-assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, LbCas12a was highly efficient at homology-directed DNA replacement in Chlamydomonas, which has been recalcitrant to efficient editing before [77].…”
Section: Using Cas12a (Formerly Named Cpf1) In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as cleavage occurs remote from the PAM and seed region, even after NHEJ-based small InDels are generated, further cleavage might still occur, which could still induce HR. In rice, using FnCas12a and LbCas12a targeted insertions via HR were accomplished and, at least for FnCas12a, with higher rates than SpCas9-based experiments [76]. Furthermore, when delivered as pre-assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, LbCas12a was highly efficient at homology-directed DNA replacement in Chlamydomonas, which has been recalcitrant to efficient editing before [77].…”
Section: Using Cas12a (Formerly Named Cpf1) In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR-Cas12a (formerly Cpf1), a class 2 type V-A CRISPR-Cas system, has also been applied for plant genome editing (Begemann et al, 2017;Endo et al, 2016a;Hu et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018a,b;Tang et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2016;Zhong et al, 2018). Unlike Cas9, Cas12a only requires CRISPR RNA (crRNA) without the need of trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) and it recognizes T-rich PAMs, resulting in staggered DNA double strand breaks (DSBs; Fagerlund et al, 2015;Zetsche et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome editing is a powerful tool for increasing plant yields, improving food quality, enhancing crop disease resistance and developing new cultivars to meet market needs (Begemann et al, 2017). At present, several strategies are being exploited to edit plant genomes, including CRISPR-Cas, meganucleases, TALENs and zinc finger nucleases (Mart ın-Pizarro and Pos e, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 Cas12a (AsCas12a), Francisella novicida Cas12a (FnCas12a) and Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 Cas12a (LbCas12a) have been used to edit the genomes of crop and model plants, including green alga, rice, soybeans and tobacco (Begemann et al, 2017;Endo et al, 2016;Ferenczi et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2017;Tang et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017a,b,c;Xu et al, 2016;Yin et al, 2017), but not citrus. In addition, the performances of the three Cas12a homologs are different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%