2013
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2013.771594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Hydrodynamic Leveling by Using Pressure Gauges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…geoid). However, Liibusk et al [4] demonstrate that in the selected study area the influence due to mean SST can be neglected. Then the corresponding height difference (ΔH) between CP pairs is computed as (cf.…”
Section: Principles Of Hydrodynamic Levellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…geoid). However, Liibusk et al [4] demonstrate that in the selected study area the influence due to mean SST can be neglected. Then the corresponding height difference (ΔH) between CP pairs is computed as (cf.…”
Section: Principles Of Hydrodynamic Levellingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All the PGs have been operational two years (2010)(2011). This study applies the same hydrodynamic levelling methodology developed in [4] for 2 years long data series (rather than annual data used in [4]). An advantage of PG is that data sampling interval can be easily changed, note that typically 5 or 10 minutes is used for maritime purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use may yield unreasonable errors in coastal areas (see Liibusk et al (2013)). Unfortunately, no specially designated high resolution MDT model for the Väinameri exists, to our present knowledge.…”
Section: Study Area and Considerations On The Mean Dynamic Topographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, disregarding the MDT values in further comparisons could be safer, since their involvement may yield errors exceeding the range of the geoid model errors. For a more extended discussion see Liibusk et al (2013). Thus, similarly to Liibusk et al (2013), the MDT values are taken as a constant (MDT = 0 in Eq.…”
Section: Study Area and Considerations On The Mean Dynamic Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation