2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2006)132:3(118)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise Height Determination Using Leap-Frog Trigonometric Leveling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main methods to transfer the height across the river are geometric levelling and trigonometric levelling. The accuracy of determining the height difference of both of them meets that of second-order levelling has in a distance above hundreds of meters 4 , 9 , 10 . And the effect of refraction is the main factor to influence the precision of river-crossing levelling 19 .…”
Section: Methods Of River-crossing Levellingmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main methods to transfer the height across the river are geometric levelling and trigonometric levelling. The accuracy of determining the height difference of both of them meets that of second-order levelling has in a distance above hundreds of meters 4 , 9 , 10 . And the effect of refraction is the main factor to influence the precision of river-crossing levelling 19 .…”
Section: Methods Of River-crossing Levellingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Zhenglu 7 analyzed the errors of TL and derived the rigid formula of precise trigonometric levelling (PTL), in theory, to replace the first order levelling. Then the leap-frog method and simultaneous-reciprocal observation method were respectively put into practice for improving the accuracy of TL to achieve PTL 9 , 10 . Zou 11 combined the leap-frog method and simultaneous-reciprocal observation method and developed a motorized PTL system (MPTL) used in tough terrains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one assessment has illustrated that digital levelling can reach an accuracy of 2 mm/km with precision of 1 mm + 1 mm/km, respectively (Bitelli et al, 2018). Leap-frogging using 150 m distance steps found an elevation precision of 1.9 mm / √ km (Ceylan and Baykal, 2006).…”
Section: Relative Positioning Using Traditional Surveyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturer specified angular precision of these equipment are 1" and 0.5" for TCA1800 and TCA2003, respectively, and 1 mm + 1 ppm for distance measurements. The backsight and foresight distances are kept equal to within 0.5 m. The standard deviation in the height difference measured between two points, defined as s H , is given as (Ceylan and Baykal, 2006) 2sin 4…”
Section: Description Of the Data Used In This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%