2020
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise genome modification in tomato using an improved prime editing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise genome editing can be achieved through the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway by introducing repair templates. Cas proteins can be further engineered to recruit effector protein domains in order to achieve base editing ( Kim, 2018 ), prime editing ( Li et al., 2020b ; Butt et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Tang et al., 2020 ; Xu et al., 2020 ), epigenome editing ( Gallego-Bartolomé et al., 2018 ; Papikian et al., 2019 ), and transcriptional regulation ( Lowder et al., 2015 , 2018 ; Piatek et al., 2015 ; Li et al., 2017 ; Tang et al., 2017 ). To date, three major CRISPR systems for plant genome editing have been successfully demonstrated: Cas9, Cas12a, and Cas12b ( Zhang et al., 2019 ; Ming et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise genome editing can be achieved through the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway by introducing repair templates. Cas proteins can be further engineered to recruit effector protein domains in order to achieve base editing ( Kim, 2018 ), prime editing ( Li et al., 2020b ; Butt et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2020 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Tang et al., 2020 ; Xu et al., 2020 ), epigenome editing ( Gallego-Bartolomé et al., 2018 ; Papikian et al., 2019 ), and transcriptional regulation ( Lowder et al., 2015 , 2018 ; Piatek et al., 2015 ; Li et al., 2017 ; Tang et al., 2017 ). To date, three major CRISPR systems for plant genome editing have been successfully demonstrated: Cas9, Cas12a, and Cas12b ( Zhang et al., 2019 ; Ming et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure of the Cas9-RT/pegRNA complexes to produce indel mutations at all four loci might have resulted from the combined negative impacts of both components. Based on these data, we hypothesize that the activity of nCas9-RT/pegRNA complexes was affected by the negative impacts of both RT fusion and pegRNA structure, which led to extremely low efficiency, and by some unknown factor, resulting in especially low efficiencies in tomato and other dicot plants 13,14 . If the above assumption is true, then we expect that when the PBS is shortened, the PE efficiency will be improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1). That is also why Lu and coworkers could not obtain a significant improvement in PE activity when they incubated explants at high temperatures 14 . Thus, we hypothesize that a range of optimized melting temperature exists for an active PBS of pegRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of independent studies has demonstrated that PE is able to achieve genome modifications in plant protoplasts as well as stable lines, but with low efficiency. These studies were mostly performed in rice but also in tomato, potato and maize (Butt et al 2020;Hua et al 2020a;Jiang et al 2020;Li et al 2020b;Lin et al 2020;Lu et al 2020a;Tang et al 2020;Veillet et al 2020a;Xu et al 2020). Obviously, a couple of different factors might influence the editing efficiency in plants, such as the nature of the reverse transcriptase, thermal conditions, length of the template, length of PBS and the requirement of the second nick.…”
Section: Prime Editing: Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%