2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise autofocusing microscope with rapid response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response time of the PSD in the proposed system is 3 μs. In addition, compared with a series of methods published by Liu et al [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] which have followed the prototype given by the system [ 19 ], as mentioned in the Introduction, the advantage lies in the detection range. In the manuscript, we present a detection range of −2 to 2 mm, which is superior to the detection range (from −0.2 to 0.2 mm) of previous techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response time of the PSD in the proposed system is 3 μs. In addition, compared with a series of methods published by Liu et al [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] which have followed the prototype given by the system [ 19 ], as mentioned in the Introduction, the advantage lies in the detection range. In the manuscript, we present a detection range of −2 to 2 mm, which is superior to the detection range (from −0.2 to 0.2 mm) of previous techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [ 14 ] employed a bisected laser beam for autofocusing and developed experimental prototypes in which the bisected laser beam is used with two achromatic lenses [ 15 ], two cylindrical lens assemblies [ 16 ], a tunable optical zoom system [ 17 ], and a high-speed optical rotating diffuser [ 18 ]. However, their techniques are limited in laser processing because the detection range verified in their method is restricted in the range −200 to 200 μm, which is not an acceptable range for detection in laser technology when compared with that of the updated autofocusing microscope device invented by Metrology Sensors GmbH (MSG) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the timing fluctuations of the laser source introduce noise, thereby degrading the measurement accuracy [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. As a result, this study proposes a method to measure and compensate for fluctuations in the laser beam geometry.…”
Section: Structure Layout and Measuring Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, some other studies have already improved the optical setup to explore the focus on a non-planar sample based on diffractive beam samplers [ 12 , 13 ] or the macro/micro dual-drive principle [ 14 ]. Furthermore, many auto-focusing devices have been developed for laser direct writing [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]; laser ablation [ 17 ]; automatic microscopy and measurement [ 18 ]; laser material processing [ 19 ]; two-photon photo-polymerization (TPP)-based micro-fabrication [ 20 ]; and several other applications [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] in Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor fabrication [ 21 ], parallel data processing [ 22 ], photonic force microscopy [ 23 ], controllable mirror-lens retrofocus objective [ 24 ], tunable lens focal offset measurement [ 25 ], laser micromachining [ 26 ], remote sensing [ 27 ], automated optical inspection [ 28 ], auto-focusing infinity corrected microscopes [ 29 ], and direct imaging technology [ 30 ] with detailed theoretical models. However, these focus detection systems are complicated, expensive, and inadequate for the mass production of 3D patterns [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%