2019
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise and Rapid Validation of Candidate Gene by Allele Specific Knockout With CRISPR/Cas9 in Wild Mice

Abstract: It is a tempting goal to identify causative genes underlying phenotypic differences among inbred strains of mice, which is a huge reservoir of genetic resources to understand mammalian pathophysiology. In particular, the wild-derived mouse strains harbor enormous genetic variations that have been acquired during evolutionary divergence over 100s of 1000s of years. However, validating the genetic variation in non-classical strains was extremely difficult, until the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tools. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If available, candidate sweep regions could be analysed for overlap with quantitative trait loci in the same or related taxa (Jacobs et al., 2017; Stinchcombe & Hoekstra, 2008). Ultimately, while not currently feasible for most ecological and evolutionary non‐model organisms, the last step could involve validating candidate sweep regions, genes, and alleles, for example using analyses of gene expression (McGirr & Martin, 2018; Rahi et al., 2017), gene editing and knockouts (Chao et al., 2019; Fernandez i Marti & Dodd, 2018), or computational methods for predicting functional changes such as modified enzyme function or protein structure (Lee et al., 2017; Tang & Thomas, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If available, candidate sweep regions could be analysed for overlap with quantitative trait loci in the same or related taxa (Jacobs et al., 2017; Stinchcombe & Hoekstra, 2008). Ultimately, while not currently feasible for most ecological and evolutionary non‐model organisms, the last step could involve validating candidate sweep regions, genes, and alleles, for example using analyses of gene expression (McGirr & Martin, 2018; Rahi et al., 2017), gene editing and knockouts (Chao et al., 2019; Fernandez i Marti & Dodd, 2018), or computational methods for predicting functional changes such as modified enzyme function or protein structure (Lee et al., 2017; Tang & Thomas, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For generation of Zdhhc2 −/− mice on the background of C57BL/6, two small guide RNAs (sgRNAs) (CAATGTTTGTCTGGTCATACTGG, TTGACACCCTAATGAAACGGAGG) were designed and synthesized according to our previous studies ( 14 , 15 ). In vitro fertilization was performed as described previously ( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATPIF1 knockout mouse was generated with the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing method with sgRNA PAM sequences targeting ATPIF1: SgRNA-1 GCAGTCGGATAGCATGGATACGG and SgRNA-2 GGCTCCACCAGCTTCTCGGATGG. A similar method was described in our published study 40 . For identification of ATPIF1 -/mice, PCR was conducted to amplify the ATPIF1 gene using the Forward primer CATCAGCCTTGGAATTCTGC and the Reverse primer CTTCGTCTCGGACTCGGTAG.…”
Section: Atpif1 -/Micementioning
confidence: 97%