2006
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise aftershock distribution of the 2005West Off Fukuoka Prefecture Earthquake (Mj=7.0) using a dense onshore and offshore seismic network

Abstract: The 2005 West Off Fukuoka Prefecture Earthquake (Mj=7.0) occurred on March 20, 2005 in the northern part of Kyushu, Japan. To study the aftershock activity, we deployed eleven pop-up type ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs), sixteen locally recorded temporary stations, and eight telemetered temporary stations in and around the epicenter region. We combined data from these stations and permanent stations located around the aftershock area, and determined the hypocenter of the mainshock and aftershocks. The mainsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the area of high seismicity within 1 week after the mainshock did not overlap with the large coseismic slip area, although some aftershocks with relatively small magnitude (M < 3) occurred on R1. The feature that aftershocks are not active where coseismic slips are large in the mainshock has also been found in other crustal strike-fault-type earthquakes in Japan: the 1995 south Hyogo (Kobe) earthquake (M JMA 7.2) (e.g., Hirata et al 1996;Ide et al 1996), the 2000 western Tottori earthquake (e.g., Ohmi et al 2002;Semmane et al 2005), the 2005 west off Fukuoka earthquake (M JMA 7.0) (e.g., Nishimura et al 2006;Uehira et al 2006), and the first large event (M JMA 6.5, April 14, 2016, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes (e.g., Asano and Iwata 2016; Kubo et al 2016). In the largest event (M JMA 7.3, April 16, 2016, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, some aftershocks occurred in the area with large coseismic slips along the Futagawa fault, while the number of the aftershocks was relatively small compared to other regions such as the Hinagu fault and the Aso area (e.g., Asano and Iwata 2016; Kubo et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the area of high seismicity within 1 week after the mainshock did not overlap with the large coseismic slip area, although some aftershocks with relatively small magnitude (M < 3) occurred on R1. The feature that aftershocks are not active where coseismic slips are large in the mainshock has also been found in other crustal strike-fault-type earthquakes in Japan: the 1995 south Hyogo (Kobe) earthquake (M JMA 7.2) (e.g., Hirata et al 1996;Ide et al 1996), the 2000 western Tottori earthquake (e.g., Ohmi et al 2002;Semmane et al 2005), the 2005 west off Fukuoka earthquake (M JMA 7.0) (e.g., Nishimura et al 2006;Uehira et al 2006), and the first large event (M JMA 6.5, April 14, 2016, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes (e.g., Asano and Iwata 2016; Kubo et al 2016). In the largest event (M JMA 7.3, April 16, 2016, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, some aftershocks occurred in the area with large coseismic slips along the Futagawa fault, while the number of the aftershocks was relatively small compared to other regions such as the Hinagu fault and the Aso area (e.g., Asano and Iwata 2016; Kubo et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the hypocenter locations therefore improved with time, and the most precise hypocenters were obtained from March 27 to April 13 because of the OBS observations. Since details of the hypocenter distribution in the period of OBS observation are discussed by Uehira et al (2006), we limit our discussion in this article to the distribution of aftershocks in the sequence and the fault system inferred from aftershock activity. Figure 2 shows the hypocenter of the mainshock of March 20 and aftershocks from March 20 to April 20.…”
Section: Hypocenter Distribution Of Aftershocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event detection and the picking of P-and S-wave arrival times were performed using the WIN system (Urabe and Tsukada, 1991), and a maximumlikelihood method was used in the calculation of hypocenter locations (Hirata and Matsu'ura, 1987). In the calculation of hypocenters and focal mechanisms, we assumed the onedimensional velocity structure model used in the data processing at SEVO (see figure 2 of Uehira et al, 2006). The magnitudes of aftershocks were determined using maximum amplitudes of velocity seismograms, which are empirically consistent with JMA magnitudes (Watanabe, 1971).…”
Section: Hypocenter Distribution Of Aftershocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely known that an ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) observation is essential to obtain a high-resolution aftershock distribution associated with large earthquakes that occurred in the marine environment (e.g., Shinohara et al, 2004;Sakai et al, 2005;Yamada et al, 2005). In addition, a spatially dense OBS observation is also necessary for a precise distribution of aftershocks occurring near a coast line be- cause a seismic network must cover a whole source region (Uehira et al, 2006;Yamada et al, 2008). Nine days after the mainshock, we started the aftershock observation using pop-up type OBSs in order to obtain detailed aftershock lateral and depth distributions of the 2007 Chuetsu-oki Earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%