2003
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise 3D skeletal kinematics using fast phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: PurposeTo examine the precision of cine‐phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques as applied to the quantification of three‐dimensional knee joint kinematics.Materials and MethodsThe knee joints of eight healthy volunteers were studied using three different dynamic, PC MRI protocols: cine‐PC (one average), cine‐PC (two averages), and cine‐PC with segmented phase encoding (fast‐PC).ResultsFast‐PC has comparable precision, shorter scan times, and improved subject interexam variability (SIEV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the need to visually identify anatomic landmarks at multiple times, as has been necessary previously [5], was eliminated. This approach has high reported accuracy (\ 0.5 mm [42]) and precision (\ 1.168 [36]) in tracking 3D PF displacements and rotations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the need to visually identify anatomic landmarks at multiple times, as has been necessary previously [5], was eliminated. This approach has high reported accuracy (\ 0.5 mm [42]) and precision (\ 1.168 [36]) in tracking 3D PF displacements and rotations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a sagittal or sagittaloblique imaging plane, which was generally perpendicular to the femoral epicondyles and bisected the patella, a full fast-PC MRI data set (anatomic and x,y,z velocity images for 24 time frames) was acquired. The MR scanning protocol details have been provided previously (Rebmann and Sheehan, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,62 However, to the best of the author's knowledge, the reliability of the actual radiograph/CT/MRI imaging procedure itself in the assessment of patellar alignment (ie, the reliability over repeated testing sessions) has only been investigated in 3 studies. Sheehan et al 83 and Rebmann and Sheehan 72 did look at the reliability of their dynamic MRI technique over 2 measurement periods, but this was done in the same testing session with the subject's position unaltered. Using kinematic MRI in 7 subjects, Powers 67 reported low intraobserver measurement error for sulcus angle (2°) and bisect offset measurement (3.4%), but high intraobserver measurement error for patellar tilt (2.9°).…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%